Interesting points. I disagree, though.
I'd be surprised if anyone can affirm such details without access to his medical records, furthermore personal who does have access are bound by privacy not to divulge such details.
Here is a somewhat professional opinion, which can't affirm anything for that matter:
http://www.webmd.com/cancer/pancreatic-cancer/news/20110825/faq-steve-jobs-pancreatic-cancer
It may very well be that surgery + following liver transplant and the coming with it immune suppressants to prevent transplant rejection have killed him. You can't beat a bug while on immune suppressant, not to say cancer.
BTW cancer survival is calculated for the 5 yrs following the diagnosis. That means if the patinets dies on the next day of the 5th year limit, he is still considered a survivor ! :) There are no studies to my knowledge comparing long-term living chances for those with cancer vs. those without.

It's a fungal infection doctors aren't trained to recognize, obviously.

Hence it's not a coincidence the only anti-fungals big pharma makes are so horribly toxic, the doctors are loathe to prescribe them.

Wouldn't want to accidentally kill the cancer while treating athlete's foot, eh?

But since the fungus is carried in by parasites, gotta kill those as well, or you'll just keep getting reinfected.

Treated both (herbs for fungus, parasites, zapper for parasites, and added a zapper for fungus and was able to stop the anti fungal herbs) and 2 months or so, the tumor was gone, but kept it up for a couple more months until nothing flared up when I didn't zap.

A bit of the fungus snuck out when the tumor collapsed, and settled in my right hip joint, so even a tiny bit grew it would start aching a bit, so I knew it wasn't quite gone yet.

Takes a while for the eggs to hatch out, and if you miss a couple days, the fungus creeps out and the parasites have time to lay more eggs. I did miss zapping some days in the process, so it took longer than it might have.

I think that the body does what it needs to do and prioritises according to these needs.

What you deem to be important or logical, is what is ordained as important by authorities - medical etc. ie not the same as the body's list of priorities.

The body simply doesnt work like that and has its own evolved agenda.

If there is no change then that is good in that there is no increase in toxicity.
Other things will certainly be going on at a level that likely we can not percieve.

Some of us, myself included have a build up of toxins that need to be cleared first before any physical changes can take place.
I would judge that I need to fast myself many times for many years to clear and repair correctly and adjust my western lifestyle habits to suit healthy living.

Another thought that occurs re: S Jobs was that despite his efforts his tumour increased in size.
This would indicate that he continued to lead an unhealthy lifestyle and/or had such toxic buildup in his body that it continued to add to the tumerous growth.
Re: metastasis - I dont believe the popular defiiniton.
It seems that the shedding of cells is a way of slowly releaseing the toxins to be ejected from the body and/or that the toxic load is so great that to maintain the organsim it spreads this toxic load.
It is not a disease that actively spreads and infects - they are our own cells - the body does not turn on itself. (We do that with continual ingestion of toxins :))

Either way - my view of the modern medical profession and all related branched remains intact and deeply tarnished! They can fix bones and perfom emergency surgery but beyond that they are of little use.
Non-intrusive diagnostics can also sometimes be of use.

Being told that you have cancer must also be an intense psychological burden esp with the hype & sensationalism around this subject that orientates the mind to percieve it in what can only be deleterious to health and consciousness.

But, this is the way society has been evolved so we have to cut through the crap to glean whatever truth we can.

Hi again kmg4.

I would also add that the existence of a tumour is proof that the body is working as it should. It has encapsulated toxins that it could not process and eleminate so they can do no more harm.

Getting rid of the tumour should not be your goal and you should not give it a second thought.

Living a healthy lifestyle is what your goal should be.

The tumour will most likely disappear or reduce when the conditions are right. It might never totally disappear.

More damage than good would come from surgery IMHO unless of course kidney function is severely threatened.

CT scans, X-rays, MRI's, Ultrasounds barium enemas etc are procedures that I now avoid.
Very simply we are beings that exist in the electromagnetic spectrum at a level of energy that expresses itself in solid form to our perception.
Muddying the natural body resonance with these intrusive proceedures which imho are also contaminants.

Ultimately it is our own individual choice.

many thanks :)