theherbalist,
On this forum we promote/follow the teaching of Dr. Christopher and Dr. Schulze, both of whom used parts (volume) not weight when making an herbal formula.
Therefore, on this forum, a part is whatever a person chooses to use. A part could be a 1/4 cup or a 1/2 cup, and on and on. We do not weigh the herbs.
An example of the meaning of "equal parts" on this forum.
Echinacea tincture:
1 part Echinacea Angustifolia root
1 part Echinacea Purpurea root
That formula calls for "equal parts". That 1 part could be a cup or a cup and a half or whatever we choose to use.
If the Echinacea tincture called for 1 part Angustifolia root and 2 parts Purpurea root, then it would not be "equal parts" but the parts would still be measured by volume not by weight.
You do realize that your example is saying the same thing, don't you? 1/2 cup of echin.a and 1/2 cup of echin.p will weigh the same.
My example is not saying the same thing. I have ordered many one pound bags of both the Echinacea roots and the Purpurea always has more volume than does the Angustifolia, yet they are both in one pound bags, which means that a 1/2 cup of each couldn't possibly weigh the same.
Of course, just to be clear, I'm speaking of cut & sifted (c/s) herbs, we never mix c/s herbs with powdered herbs when making up a formula, we either use all of one or all of the other.
Edit: After I typed the message I thought I would measure a 1/2 cup of both the Echinacea roots just for kicks and so I'd be able to report on the forum for those who might not be aware that volume and weight are not equal.
I have an old kitchen scale that measures in ounces not the newer digital ones so the measurement is probably not exact like it would be on the newer digital scales however, it's close enough for me to clearly see that one weighed double what the other weighed. The Angustifolia, 1/2 cup weighed 3oz., the Purpurea, 1/2 cup weighed 1.5oz.
theherbalist2011 --->>> >>>Generally, "equal parts" implies weighing out each herb to the same weight.<<<
Oops, nope, incorrect, false, untrue, wrongo...insert that 'game show Wrong Answer buzzer' sound here.
Equal parts must be qualified...equal parts by weight? OR equal parts by volume?
Since Dr. Christopher was the greatest American herbalist & healer of which we have record (and between he and his student, Dr. Schulze, they have written & published more information than any other American herbalist); and since this forum follows the works & tenets of Dr. Christopher & Dr. Schulze (along with their mentors, students and other great healers & herbalists of the same methodology). :::deep breath::: and since Dr. Christopher and Dr. Schulze virtually ALWAYS measured the herbs for their formula as "parts by volume", it is incorrect to state: 'generally, equal parts implies equal parts by weight'...particularly when dealing with American herbal formulas.
Are there exceptions? of course...but when it comes to these prolifically published herbalists, the exceptions are not the 'rule of thumb'
One of the most stellar traits of Dr. Christopher (and Dr. Schulze, up until a few years ago), was in the free & open sharing of their formulas. In fact, Dr. Christopher's goal was "an herbalist in every home; a master herbalist in every community". If everyone on earth has knowledge & the ability to create their own healing herbal tinctures and blends, there'd be no need for the Pharmaceutical Cartel. But what percentage of homes in the US/worldwide have a scale that weighs in ounces? Very few. Grams? Even fewer! I realize you're a "bio-chemist" so you deal in "exactitudes"...but there's virtually no illness OR herbal formulation that requires such persnickety-perfect-exactness. It's my goal (hence this forums) to EMPOWER people 'exactly where they are'. No one needs to have any 'specialty equipment' in order to make successful tinctures and herb blends (certainly peoples for thousands of years that healed themselves with herbs/foods had only the most rudimentary of tools). There are MANY people on this forum and CZ (and the world) that have the money for, say, a month's worth of Superfood OR the money for a scale...I want to be sure they have what they need (and that they don't feel as though they're "messing up" or somehow "doing harm" to themselves because they've made their herbal blends without a scale).
Methinks anyone that has the "ocd need" for persnickety-exactness AND has a calling to assist others to heal themselves, has the responsibility to translate their "formulas by weight" into "formulas by volume" so that every person can easily create them. Of course, in many cases, the entire reason for the illusion of the need for sensitive scales and "scientific detail" is to ensure the profitability of the herb blend (and/or to ensure that those buying become dependent upon the seller). One of the biggest lies ever embedded throughout society is that we don't have the 'scientific knowledge or exactitudes' to be able to treat & heal our own bodies. That ensured that they own our wallets AND our bodies for as long as we live. As modern healers, we should be part of the solution, not part of the problem :)
Speaking of 'persnickety-perfect-exactness' (as in the kind you'd expect to find in a laboratory)...the fact is, only the most advanced of equipment would yield technically 'exact' results when measuring by weight. That's because the water content varies (sometimes substantially) in both fresh OR dried herbs. What we commonly source as "dried herbs' are not necessarily 100% dry - the percentage of 'dryness' will vary (sometimes substantially). So unless one has done advanced testing to reveal the exact hydration of every dried herb (or fresh herb) they're using, even the same exact weight will yield differing amounts of the herbal constituents in each herb. Even the humidity in the room will alter the exactness.
As you likely know (so this is for all readers now & 'to come'), this is CRUCIAL to creating herbal formulas! One pound of dried mullein or peppermint leaf has the volume of small pillow; one pound of dried comfrey or echinacea root has the volume of the size of a couple of pounds of butter. When an herbalist instructs to use 'equal parts' in one of their formulas, it is IMPERATIVE to know if they mean by weight or by volume, and not to make assumptions.
Blessings,
Uny
jajaja. sweet. :-)
Uny's posted a good balancing and foundational piece, as usual!
I have one thought to add to the mix. The more you can get your produce from close to home, the better it MIGHT be.
(But for some this could mean, just the same side of the border, considering.)
The sense here is, all the balance of minerals and so on...is correct for your area. This is coming from macrobiotics theory to some extent, but I feel there is a lot to it, that we don't yet fully comprehend. It's simple though--like the herbalist's truism that one's medicine will be found growing close by? I also feel there is a lot to proceeding intuitively, providing the intuitive channels are working well. I don't think they do work, when there is either too much ego, or much fear--which is just the opposite of love, and a good friend to ego. ;-)
Of course, now that people travel everywhere, this kind of "close by" theory doesn't fully hold up, as we are inundated with "everywhere". But I'm thinking mmm of the jalapenos in the mix the fellow was putting together; Schulze always said "get the hottest you can get". I'm just speculating here however, that the jalapenos might have come from close by, and in this way might have all kinds of good "stuff" (to use the technical term)that makes up for the fact they are not the "hottest". I'm someone who loves the slurry of the super tonic, and believe it's
a mastery of synergy beyond even the strained version.I just feel there is a lot of goodness in that pulp, that stays in the pulp, and is even better staying with the juice. But that's just an intuitive hunch; and a work in progress, insofar as my ability to express this goes.
I notice the video-fellow seems to like to drink the tonic as a "tonic", more than a remedy per se. I like it that way also--prophylactically.
C