Spy Counts + Press Release June 8, 2011
Press Release I am seeing for the first time
Date: 6/8/2011 4:54:07 AM ( 13 y ) ... viewed 1038 times http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_23381.cfm
I will take this on when I have the energy.
2:51 am
June 8, 2011
This has links on Julia Sabin stock in Dean,
a parent comapny for R.W. Knudsen.
She has midwifed R.W. Knudsen,
that makes numbers of organic juices
and is part of the non-GMO project.
I am looking forward to interviewing
Julia Sabin before long.
FROM THE ORGANIC SPIES FACEBOOK PAGE
2:56 am
June 8, 2011
We are recommending that every small organic farmer and product company become a member of the OTA today and vote out the board members we have identified that work for companies that profit from GE foods. If the OTA is unable to find new ethical board members in this year's election, a 100% Organic Trade Association must be formed.
http://www.facebook.com/organicspies
Organic Spies When we say "changed the GE labeling debate", all of us together put GE labeling front and center on the agenda of the OTA and other organizations that are looking for more grassroots support.
YESTERDAY ON ORGANIC SPIES FB
SITE
The Quote of the day, Thanks to Michael T. Bishop. "As a consumer I would like to see the board and members of the OTA, especially the President Julia Sabin, substantiate their position on GMO labe...ling and lead by example. They don't need to wait until labeling is mandated to begin placing labels on their products. They can start the movement by voluntarily placing labels on their products today."
MANDATORY LABELING
http://www.facebook.com/no2gmo?sk=wall&filter=1
I posted here yesterday.
LOOKING AT NON GMO FACEBOOK SITE
Led me to this comment that needs
to be taken on
http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/news/local/ct-met-gmo-food-labeling--20110...
KarlHarovonMogel at 12:49 PM May 25, 2011
Apparently Facebook comments don't get posted, so here goes again:
This article has several problems. The 2011 Spanish study mentioned did not find that there was an equal number of positive and negative papers on GE crops - that is false and widely misreported. What they said (in a poorly written sentence) is that the number of lab groups with positive and negative outlooks has reached an equilibrium since the last survey period. So if 9/10 were positive in 2004 and 9/10 were positive in 2010 then it is at an equilibrium. So they did not find that the number of lab groups were equal, nor the number of studies. Positive studies vastly outweigh the few negative studies that exist. Many of those negative studies suffer from methodological deficiencies that the scientific community continues to point out.
For a list of over 300 studies that make a conclusion favorable to GE crops, you can go to this page on Biofortified, an independent site I co-run: http://www.biofortified.org/genera/studies-for-genera/
http://www.facebook.com/OrganicTrade/posts/232066740140880
I agree with you Erica that we need to hold the Biotech industry responsible for GMO proliferation. Hopefully we can have a real Dialogue on Science, Ethics, and Food that is long over due. Powerful information is coming out now.
SPY COUNTS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCK0MTS4mvI
11981
June 17, 2011
10,716
June 11, 2011
11:01
10389
June 10, 2011
2011
6:33 pm
this one must be incorrect?
10430
June 10, 2011
4:07 pm
9473
June 9, 2011
10:15 pm
8776
June 8
2:25 pm
8748
June 8
7:57 am
8716
views June 8
OS
3:57 am
JUST EAT ORGANIC COUNTS
65123
June 8, 2011
2:27 pm
WOULD LIKE HIM TO WRITE A STORY
ABOUT THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PICTURE
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596645772
PRESS RELEASE
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_23381.cfm
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites! Print this page
Email this page
Alert Webmaster
|