The concept of ”TIME” is a very interesting topic, but I don’t think it can accurately be comprehended. The book that might be described or summing up and EXPLAINING REALITY (the bible) can be thought of as describing 2 (TWO) TIMES/EPOCHS. Jesus was sent to earth ”as a plan for THE FULNESS OF TIME” (yes, the END OF TIME). He ended the age of time,....and also began the age of eternity).....He is the ETERNAL SABBATH OF ETERNAL GOD...... Deuteronomy 33:27 .....ETERNAL GOD... Jesus ”THE CHRIST” the lion of Judah became IMMANUEL the LAMB OF GOD (that’s what the book of Revelation is ...
[retrieve this message]

---

The concept of”TIME” is a very interesting topic, but I don’t think it can accurately be comprehended. The book that might be described or summing up and EXPLAINING REALITY (the bible) can be thought of as describing 2 TIMES/EPOCHS. Jesus was sent to earth ”as a plan for THE FULNESS OF TIME” (yes, the END OF TIME). He ended the age of time,....and also began the age of eternity).....He is the ETERNAL SABBATH OF ETERNAL GOD...... Deuteronomy 33:27 .....ETERNAL GOD... Jesus ”THE CHRIST” the lion of Judah became IMMANUEL the LAMB OF GOD (that’s what the book of Revelation is all abo ...
[retrieve this message]

---

The concept of”TIME” is a very interesting topic, but I don’t think it can accurately be comprehended. The book that might be described or summing up and EXPLAINING REALITY (the bible) can be thought of as describing 2 TIMES/EPOCHS. Jesus was sent to earth ”as a plan for THE FULNESS OF TIME” (yes, the END OF TIME). He ended the age of time,....and also began the age of eternity).....He is the ETERNAL SABBATH OF ETERNAL GOD...... Deuteronomy 33:27 .....ETERNAL GOD... Jesus ”THE CHRIST” the lion of Judah became IMMANUEL the LAMB OF GOD (that’s what the book of Revelation is all abo ...
[retrieve this message]

---

The concept of”TIME” is a very interesting topic, but I don’t think it can accurately be comprehended. The book that might be described or summing up and EXPLAINING REALITY (the bible) can be thought of as describing 2 TIMES/EPOCHS. Jesus was sent to earth ”as a plan for THE FULNESS OF TIME” (yes, the END OF TIME). He ended the age of time,....and also began the age of eternity).....He is the ETERNAL SABBATH OF ETERNAL GOD...... Deuteronomy 33:27 .....ETERNAL GOD... Jesus ”THE CHRIST” the lion of Judah became IMMANUEL the LAMB OF GOD (that’s what the book of Revelation is all abo ...
[retrieve this message]

---

https://www.history.com/news/536-volcanic-eruption-fog-eclipse-worst-year#:~:text=But%20in%20536%20A.D.%2C%20much,say%2C%20the%20literal%20Dark%20Age. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Jerusalem_(536) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/536 The volcanic winter of 536….. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcanic_winter_of_536 https://www.thoughtco.com/dust-veil-environmental-disaster-in-europe-171628 https://medievalreporter.com/worst-year-ever-536/ It seems that others have also noticed that the verse could actually refer to something extraordinary and astrological/a ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Revelation 8:11 The name of the star is Wormwood. A third of the waters became wormwood, and many men died of the water, because it was made bitter. Revelation 8:12 The fourth angel blew his trumpet, and a third of the sun was struck, and a third of the moon, and a third of the stars, so that a third of their light was darkened; a third of the day was kept from shining, and likewise a third of the night. I was never really able to make any PRACTICAL sense of verse 12 (especially timewise), but now I wonder if the ONE THIRD has to do with the damage caused by WORMWOOD of verse 11.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

This at least seems like a VERY weird story, but I know that it is PROBABLY very true and accurate. Rev. 8:12 is about THE SUN,THE MOON, and the stars and that TIME was changed (gregorian calendar and Julian calendar).   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Could Krakatoa and the black plague be what Revelation 8:12 is referring to??....(the disasters caused by the nuclear winter of 536 a.d.). [Video Embedded Here]   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

[Video Embedded Here]   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

  Cosmology: two ideas The  ’’big bang’’ idea explains how hot singularity created billions hot stars when the rest of the universe is extremely cold Big bang says nothing about where did ordinary matter come from (it says: chickens come from eggs and eggs come  from chickens:  singularity   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Gravity == 1 - Newton's gravity Newton explained gravity from Earthly point of view ( as a boy playing on the beach of an ocean) Newton explained gravity as interaction between two bodies in the flat Solar system ( no curved, no distorted, no warped space ) 2 - Einstein's gravity Einstein explained gravity from Cosmic point of view ( as a boy flying at speed of light ) Einstein explained gravity when there is only one single body (gravity-masses) These gravity-masses (of Sun) can distort the flat continuum of the Universe only in Its very small , local reg ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Fine Structure Constant Quotes tagged as ”fine-structure-constant” Showing 1-30 of 73 https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/fine-structure-constant = “The bridge between the electron and the other elementary particles is provided by the fine structure constant. ... An expanded form of the constant leads to equations that define the transformation of electromagnetic energy into electron mass/energy, ...” ― Malcolm H. Mac Gregor # “Arnold Sommerfeld generalized Bohr’s model to include elliptical orbits in three dimensions. He treated the problem relativistically ( ...
[retrieve this message]

---

About ’’real’’ imaginary numbers in mathematics and ’’not-real’’ imaginary numbers in physics. ==== Imaginary numbers are a fine and wonderful refuge of the divine spirit almost an amphibian between being and non-being. / Gottfried Leibniz / # One might think this means that imaginary numbers are just a mathematical game having nothing to do with the real world. From the viewpoint of positivist philosophy, however, one cannot determine what is real. All one can do is find which mathematical models describe the universe we live in. It turns out that a mathematical model i ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Actually, ”Time-identity” is an insightful and interesting expression of a brilliant concept. Just for the sake of productive conversation, I’ll tell you that for the last couple of years I’ve been writing about the ”age of time and the age of eternity” on the Christian Debate forum. I understand that man’s concept of ”TIME” is based on our imagined concept of ”IDENTITY” and egotistical individuality/exclusivity, it is not based on the unity and equality of the human race as a whole (civilization). Our Savior was sent to earth ”as a plan for...THE FULNESS OF TIME” (direct quote fro ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Infinity, Eternity, Zero Vacuum, Our limited time-identities reject infinity (something without boundaries, without physical laws ) but Infinity zero vacuum continuum (without time) is real physical concept with many laws. ===========   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Innovation: abstraction and reality: plogiston and Ideal gas. === Quote by Albert Einstein about the value of Innovation: “We can not solve our problems with the same level of thinking that created them.” # There are two ways of innovation. a) to solve a problem with one absolutely new idea ( like Planck’s quantum of action) b) to solve a problem looking it from another point of view ( like was solved problem that ’’ heat is not a phlogiston substance, but a dynamical form of mechanical effect’’ that  slowly  evolved into the new science of  ’’thermodynamics’’) # The ’’phl ...
[retrieve this message]

---

  God-particle (without Nobel Prize) and Vacuum. ==.. To discover so-called God - particle ( Nobel Prize in 2013) was needed two conditions : deep vacuum  and  high energy. But the CERN  project says: if energy is higher and vacuum is deeper then it is possible to discover some kind of a  new  particles. Question: what is the deepest vacuum in the Universe? My answer: the deepest vacuum in the Universe is cosmic zero vacuum T=0K. Question: what can be the highest energy? My answer: the cosmic zero vacuum T=0K continuum is itself some kind of infinite energy continuum. # Wh ...
[retrieve this message]

---

A brief thought of fundamental basis in Physics. (by Socratus) == Physics is created on some fundamental basis. At first the basis was an absolute space and an absolute time. But after discovering SRT, GRT, QT -  Newtonian basis was changed: there isn’t  absolute space, there isn’t  absolute time. In this situation scientists decided that universe was started from ’’singular point’’ (big bang theory).  Most believe in such scenario. A few don’t believe.  Why? a) Gravity forces are the weakest in nature and cannot create ’’singular point’’ in the region as big as the whole Univ ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Infinitely big and infinitely small. Infinity Is a Beautiful Concept – And It’s Ruining Physics By Max Tegmark | February 20, 2015 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2015/02/20/infinity-ruining-physics/#.WtWYPohubIU ============== My opinion. The  “infinitely big” is zero vacuum T=0K and the “infinitely small ” is Planck’s quantum of action (h) All ”Physics Breakdown” between border of T=0K and (h) (exactly as in case with black hole) To understand the law of  ”Physics Breakdown” we don’t need new laws of Physics. Enough to understand a) T=0K, b) QP, c) SRT, d) ...
[retrieve this message]

---

 GRAVITY-TIME  and  GRAVITY-SPACE  and  SPACE-TIME. a) There is only one kind of ’’time’’ and it is gravity-time.   There is only one kind of ’’ space’’ and it is gravity- space. We live on/in  Earth’s  gravity-time and gravity-space. For us this gravity-time and gravity-space  are absolute and different qualities. All laws of physics are the same on every gravity- planet:    so-called ’’inertial reference frame.’’ b) But Einstein and Minkowski discovered another system of existence so-called ’’ absolute 4-D spacetime’’. This system doesn’t have gravity. About this system Min ...
[retrieve this message]

---

One of the reason - we don’t know the geometrical form of quantum particle. q/particle as a point cannot be real particle. q/particle as a string is subjective opinion. Physicists chose string (with Planck’s length but without thickness ) only because it can vibrate and therefore make waves. they don’t show the physical conditions which can allow the string exist. ========================= I think that q/particle must have geometrical form of membrane. Why? a) point under strong microscope will be looked as a membrane/circle. b) string to be string* is heeded force in two diffe ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Why everything was started from the zero vacuum (T=0K) ? Because there is fundamental fact in Nature. A Universe with the critical density is said to be flat. The critical density in the whole Universe is so small (the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that the Universe as whole cannot be curved, the Universe as whole must be a flat continuum. # The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) indicate that the energy density in the universe is equal to critical density (within a 0.5% margin of error) , from which it f ...
[retrieve this message]

---

1) We live on planet Earth therefore when we say time it must mean gravity-time. Gravity-time depends on its  masses and speed. Without gravity-masses we don’t have time. SRT is theory without gravity, without gravity-mass therefore it can seem  that SRT is a timeless theory. 2)  But  indeed, SRT does speak about a time. It can mean that the subject of SRT is not gravity-time, but time that belongs to the individual quantum particles. These  quantum particles  have  no gravity-mass, but they  have pure energy-mass. And this pure energy mass of quantum particles depend on thei ...
[retrieve this message]

---

  By the way,  Minkowski 4D spacetime is as absolute reference frame as the aether medium. The views of space and time which I wish to lay before you have sprung from the soil of experimental physics, and therein lies their strength. They are radical. Henceforth, space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality.    Minkowski.       (Sep 21, 1908)              Then, why do we need complex mathematical equations (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space)   to expla ...
[retrieve this message]

---

SRT (an another interpretation) ======================== 1. Light quanta move trough an absolute aether medium: T=0K. a) this was Maxwell and Lorenz point of view. b) Minkowski hid this absolute aether medium into mathematical unity of 4D spacetime (an other name is : negative -2D Pseudo-Euclidian space) 2) the speed of quantum of light in zero vacuum (T=0K) is constant (c=1) 3) all movements (including the constant speed of quantum of light) are relative motions in the respect to an absolute aether medium T=0K. 4) It is possible if constant speed of quantum of light is min ...
[retrieve this message]

---

  Accelerators  as a scientific  Sisyphus stone.  / by Israel Socratus / Accelerators  are Useless and produce Nothing for humankind. ======. In 1906, Rutherford studied internal structure of atoms, bombarding them with high energy a- particles. This idea helped him to understand the structure of atom. But the clever Devil interfered and gave advice to physicists to enlarge the energy of bombarding  the target. And physicist created huge cannon-accelerators of particles. And they began to bomb micro particles in the  vacuum,  in hoping to understand their inner structure. And t ...
[retrieve this message]

---

  The existing interpretation of quantum mechanics is contrary to common sense.          WHY? ================   The Universe from Nothing: T=0K. (by Israel Socratus) ====... Maybe 99% thinks that everything began from big-bang. A few % have another opinion: Book ’A universe from nothing’ by Lavrence M. Kruass. ===. My opinion. Why  everything was started from Nothing ? Because there is fundamental fact in Nature : The critical density in the whole Universe  is so small that it cannot ’close’  the Universe into sphere. And therefore the Universe as whole is flat - infini ...
[retrieve this message]

---

   BRIEF  HISTORY  of  SYMMETRY and  ASYMMETRY.  / by Socratus / =====…    a)  In 1905  Einstein involved negative time in his SRT. b) Nobody knew what negative time  can mean  and therefore Minkowski in 1908 changed negative time into positive time creating 4-D spacetime. The theory became very beautiful  and as a young physicist said me: ‘ My professor says that you cannot be physicist if you don’t understand the beauty of SRT in Minkowski’s interpretation.’ but . . .  but nobody knew and nobody knows  what 4-D really is.  (!) So, Minkowski was the first person who put ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Theories and Laws Flowery Wall Paper and Long Dead Geegaws Decorate the Walls of our Mental Ward World Reasonability and Reasonableness Cloak Our Fragile and Vulnerable Lobes Straw House Materials The Storm is Outside Huffin and a Puffin Logic’s Intellicide Ego’s Event K2 Why the large database number? One is enough, or two for comparison, three, well that’s just silly. Amoebae or ”colonial bags of water”, capacitating high minded sperm like sentience. Ah theres the rub. 20,000 different coding texts seems more pertinent to this organism analysis of extrapolations in time, ...
[retrieve this message]

---

wow, this is so twisted. You know that it took billions of years make life, it took another set of billions for life to evolve to humans. So much information that we need is already created. We only need to duplicate this information over and over. It’s like you will have to type 10000 word document, then you can simply copy the document in very less time.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Big bang and an intelligent pregnant woman. ===… According to ‘big bang’ the Universe exists 14 billion years. Woman gives birth to a reasonable child during 280 days. A body made up of perhaps 100 trillion different cells. A single human cell contains as much information as a library with a thousand volumes. Book: “ The unity of Nature” “ The information content in the nucleus of a single human cell is comparable to that of a library containing a thousand volumes.” / page 40, by Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker / https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_von_Weiz ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Very brief electromagnetic history. / By Israel Socratus / ===… Part one. Oersted demonstrated connection between electricity and magnetism. Ampere gave mathematical explanation to this effect. Faraday discovered the reverse effect: relationship between magnetic and electric fields. ( how to use magnetism to induce electricity) Maxwell (using mechanical model: balls, springs, hooks . . . etc.) found mathematical equations to describe Faraday’s idea. Oliver Heaviside reformulated twelve (12) Maxwell’s equations to the modern four (4) equations. Hertz discovered Maxwe ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Religion is always god-centered and so science cannot be a religion since it has nothing to do with the existence or non-existence of a god. The definition of science is ”knowledge derived from observation”.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Great bibliography. Interesting how many we associate with conventional Physics also pursue what are often considered alternative physical concepts. Newton certainly had an extreme interest in alchemy as well as the traditional Hebrew writings w re to numerology and escatology. N Bohr was described as a mystic by some. Interesting also how Einstein spent a fair amount of time mentioning intuition in comparison to discursions limitations in discovery and understanding. Furthermore some have reported that while his original unification ideas were dismissed by the accepted physicists ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Information / consciousness (like light quanta, electrons, atoms . . . . ) is a part of the Universe. Book: “Why does the world exist?”. By Jim Holt. “In the other words, maybe all of reality – subjective and objective – is made out of the same basic stuff. That is pleasingly simple hypothesis. But isn’t it a bit crazy? Well, it didn’t strike Bertrand Russell that way. In fact, it was essentially the conclusion Russell reached in “The Analysis of Matter”. Nor did it strike the great physicist Sir Arthur Eddington as craze. In “The Nature of the Physical World” (1928), Edding ...
[retrieve this message]

---

God particles, without Nobel Prize. / by Socratus/ ==.. To discover so-called God - particle ( Nobel Prize in 2013) was needed two conditions : deep vacuum and high energy. But if the vacuum were deeper and energy were higher then it would be possible to discover some kind of a new God – particles. Question: what is the deepest vacuum in the Universe? My answer: the deepest vacuum in the Universe is the cosmic zero vacuum T=0K. Question: what can be the highest energy? My answer: the cosmic zero vacuum T=0K continuum is itself some kind of infinite energy continu ...
[retrieve this message]

---

The Universe: two scenarios. /by Israel Socratus/ ===… Scenario number one: Big Bang. At t=0 moment of BB: a) the temperature was infinite (go to infinite) b) the density was infinite. (go to infinite) c) the volume was zero (go to zero) d) BB reached a boundary to spacetime itself. e) here the laws of physics break down. f) today BB is prestige cosmological scenario. # Scenario number two: Zero Vacuum. a) the temperature is T=0K (the boundary of heat) b) the density is infinite (we cannot reach T=0K and its density). c) the volume is infinite but the volume of i ...
[retrieve this message]

---

”Because one (1) can be different from another one (1).” In nature one can never be equal to another one. Therefore 1+1 = 2 is never valid. It is valid only for real numbers. In nature everything is like apples and oranges. They cannot be added. Even two apples cannot be added, because they are different. In math 1+1=2, this two is a single item on the real line. It is called closed under addition operation. When you add two objects from nature, they never produce another single object. You cannot describe any property of any object of nature using mathematics. You cannot descr ...
[retrieve this message]

---

The Universe (as a material reality) was emerged from one common source. The ancient Vedic teachers called it – Brahman, Lao-Tzu called it – Tao, The prophets of the Book called it – Yahweh or Allah. Today the scientific officially community called this ”common source”– Big Bang. Of course, there is also a scientific possibility that the ”common source for the material reality ” can be . . . 11- dimensions or M- dimensions, . . . But tomorrow . . . . When the next revolution rocks physics, chances are it will be about nothing - — the vacuum, that endless infinite void. ...
[retrieve this message]

---

The reason that I posted that this was the wrong forum for the quantum physics discussion is because the original message was cross-posted onto the Abuse Forum. ;-) Quantum physics is a very interesting subject, aside from that!  :-D   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Electricity or vibration is that same energy, same power, ye call God. Not that God is an electric light or an electric machine, but vibration that is creative is of the same energy as life itself. Edgar Cayce Reading 2828-4 http://www.edgarcayce.org/are/egroups.aspx?id=1346   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

God and Soul in Quantum Theory. / By Socratus. / =. Can the conception of God and Soul have Physical Background? My answer is: ”Yes, God and Soul have physical background and can be explained by physical formulas, equations and laws.” I will try to prove my position. =. Question: what is God? The Religious answer: God is something Absolute, Infinite, Eternal, Spiritual, the Highest form of Consciousness, Who created everything in the Universe. The Physical answer ( in my opinion) is more concrete: There is an Absolute, Infinite, Eternal Reference Frame and IT is ...
[retrieve this message]

---

History of the ”quantum of action” (1900-1927) / by Socratus / a) In 1900 Planck united together two formulas ( Rayleigh–Jeansfor for long and Wien’s for short wavelengths) and then divided them. He was himself very surprised when the result was found correct. And after that came . . . . : ” . . . some weeks of the hardest work of my life . . .” The result was – quantum of action (as energy multiply time: h=Et) The coefficient (h) was neither in the Rayleigh–Jeansfor nor in the Wien’s formulas. Planck took unit (h) as in some books are written: ”intuitively, instinctively, ...
[retrieve this message]

---

In the Movie ’Particle Fever’ the Iranian scientist kept saying: - there is something wrong with the Verse - if my math is correct it will self destruct - the math does not add up.. - where has all the anti matter gone? ..”Magic”   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

http://www.icr.org/article/evidence-for-young-world/ Evidence for a Young World by D. Russell Humphreys, Ph.D. Download Evidence for a Young World PDF Evidence for Creation › Evidence from Science › Evidence from the Physical Sciences › The Universe Was Created › The Universe Was Created Recently Spiral galaxy NGC 1232 in constellation Eridanus. Photo: European Southern Obs ... [Image Embedded Here]
[retrieve this message]

---

Hopefully its true enough as theory such that we work with evidence by experience, more than education by caveat bound dogmatic repetition, so that as our experience is continualy confronted by different proposals, we might refine our interpretation and add and subtract from our educatedness. The thoughts in the texts of Maurice Cotterell, Rupert Sheldrake and Paul La Violette, especially as compared to 100 year old coventional Maxwell less Q theory evan w all of that era’s extrapolative apologetics, on these topics are fabulously interesting, desisivly revealing and hypotheticly wise, ...
[retrieve this message]

---

What is about photosynthesis in Nature ? =   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

By the “theory” we were educated: “ if we cannot observe physical phenomenon then it doesn’t exist. We can ignore this phenomenon. “ Today the situation is : there are two fundamental constants in nature: T=0K and constant speed of photon: c-1. =. We cannot reach constant speed of photon c=1 but photon can and ( thanks to Michelson ) it was observed and therefore it was accepted. We cannot reach T=0K, we cannot straight observe phenomena in T=0K. Any instrument does not fit. But can this mean that this continuum is abstract ? The “vacuum fluctuations / transformation ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Thanks for the tip, Hanna. I had not gotten around to checking Escher out. Ever see any Rube Goldberg inventions? https://www.google.com/search?q=rube+goldberg+inventions&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=OP_xU_G5DNG3yASB_YDICg&ved=0CD4Q7Ak&biw=929&bih=571   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

The first thing I noticed was the Escher print. I loved his book with prints and had some framed.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Somehow this reminds me of a fun website. For a list of unworkable inventions check out the site below. Fun to look over. Some folks are too smart for their own good......... https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/unwork.htm   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

There is no such thing as a vacuum.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

QM doesn’t have real particles? protons, neutrons, electrons and photons are not real.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

it’s much easier to think of energy/matter in the form of quarks and leptons.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Oh, non-mechanical. Large and small, hm. Sounds familiar, atomic voids and all the holes making up matter, so its actually fields of persuasion, ok. While so many of us agree more than we actually disagree about such topics, the reletive and absolute value is in each ones theoretical and or real world, practicality, as u mention, and that any real or theoretical practicality is by degrees, muted, degraded or revealed as worthless, by any needed special addendas, caveats, to limitations found in its use. (really dont need to go any further here, especially for those whose drive is to k ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Today Quantum mechanics is ”non-mechanical” theory. Why? Because Classic Mechanics deals with objects that have real physical parameters : size, volume, geometrical forms and QM doesn’t have real particles. In QM we are missed the geometrical form of quantum particle. Real quantum particle cannot be a ”point”. Real quantum particle cannot be a ”firm golf-ball” ( forbidden by SRT) Using models like ”point-particle” or ”firm golf-ball”, we cannot describe QM in mechanical terms. One can adopt QM ”visually” only understanding the mechanical model of quantum particle (!) ...
[retrieve this message]

---

In a vacuum particles are seen to spontaneously come in and out of existence and as a result there is all sorts of theories of “physical nothingness”. IMO the problem is basically what is energy? No one has a definition. There are definitions of types of energy but not of what is energy. It is this fundamental question that needs answering that could explain the particles that come in and out of existence in a vacuum and hence to explain what is a vacuum really. There is plenty of evidence of an aspect of reality that is non-physical. I don’t see a true dualism as such. I believe that ...
[retrieve this message]

---

http://curezone.com/upload/_G_H_Forums/lonely_photon.jpg   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Agreed.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Photons know a few tricks that physicists don’t. ==.. 1. Einstein discovered photons *without mass*. 2. Dirac discovered virtual photons with *imaginary mass*. 3. Photons take part into photosynthesis and must have *positive mass* ( biological physics - quantum biology) 4. These three kinds of photons should not be imagined as being the same kind of photons that we see from a flashlight. ==.. There isn’t *Physics* without *Quantum Physics*. There isn’t * Biological Physics* without *Quantum Biology*. Physics - - Quantum Physics -- Biological Physics - - ...
[retrieve this message]

---

http://curezone.com/upload/_G_H_Forums/faster_than_light.gif   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

http://www.aei.mpg.de/~mpoessel/Physik/FTL/tunnelingftl.html#Supp Faster-than-light speeds in tunneling experiments: an annotated bibliography Revision and enlargement of this page is now permanently stalled - this page is no longer updated. Some less ancient references (as of 2001) are added in piecemeal fashion, below. One central tenet of special relativity theory is that light speed is the greatest speed at which energy, information, signals etc. can be transmitted. In many physics-related internet newsgroups, claims have appeared that recent tunneling experiments show this ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Einstein didn’t understand his SRT. ” During our crossing, Einstein explained his theory to me every day, and by the time we arrived I was fully convinced: he understood it.” / Chaim Weizmann,1921. After he escorted Einstein to the USA/ ==.. My opinion about Einstein’s SRT. 1. One of Einstein’s postulate says that quantum of light moves in a straight line with constant and independent speed c=1 (in the vacuum). 2. The other Einstein’s SRT postulate says that movement is relative conception. The name of Einstein’s article is : “ On the Electrodynamics of moving Bod ...
[retrieve this message]

---

I do absolutely agree with you. You put into words what I have been thinking for a long time but could not express it. I have read all of Carlos Castaneda’s works, and the ones of his group. I do not believe all of what he taught but his works are filled with wisdom. One thing you mentioned is the thing of self centered responsibility that I call self-importance. Here is your quote: ”We gain freedom in losing self centered responsibility. We lose deluded self importance in discovering the falsity of dignity.” Here is one quote from a Carlos Castenada book: ”Self-importance is an ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Time, another player on the field of display. And while the display may be as completly illusory as some claim, in that view time is as relevant and real as any other (illusory)thing.(However perish the thought of time being just another player. Time is like the glue, the real god particle, and those who miss such things, will often need to continue to create reasons and excuses that perpetuate the discussion, rather than solve the real delima) We gain freedom in losing self centered responsibility. We lose deluded self importance in discovering the falsity of dignity. When we n ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Is time real, or the ultimate illusion? Most physicists would say the latter, but Lee Smolin challenges this orthodoxy in his new book, ”Time Reborn” (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, April 2013), which he discussed here Wednesday (April 24) at the Rubin Museum of Art. In a conversation with Duke University neuroscientist Warren Meck, theoretical physicist Smolin, who’s based at Canada’s Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, argued for the controversial idea that time is real. ”Time is paramount,” he said, ”and the experience we all have of reality being in the present moment is not ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Time doesn’t exist. It is a relational concept only @Sione. K. Palu =. How old are you? The answer is hidden in relation between Sun and Earth It means that the time (year) depends on the orbit of Earth around the Sun If the diameter of orbit were another the time (year) would be also another For example: You are 40 years old But if the diameter of orbit were smaller then you would be 50 years old And if the diameter of orbit were bigger then you would be 30 years old @Socratus ==.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

http://www.aip.org/history/heisenberg/p08c.htm Many people sought deeper meanings in Heisenberg’s discovery, feeling that it cast doubt on knowledge itself. Others held that outside the realm of atomic measurements, human understanding remained as certain (or doubtful) as ever. Cartoon by John Richardson for Physics World, March 1998 Heisenberg realized that the uncertainty relations had profound implications. First, if we accept Heisenberg’s argument that every concept has a meaning only in terms of the experiments used to measure it, we must agree that things that can ...
[retrieve this message]

---

http://www.metafysica.nl/holism/implicate_order_20.html Wholeness and the Implicate Order Quantum Theory and the Implicate Order We will now further elaborate the theory of wholeness, especially in relation to quantum theory. BOHM’s Quantum Theory of Hidden Variables, or Theory of the Sub-quantum Introduction In his main book on the theory of the Implicate Order Wholeness and the Implicate Order, 1980, BOHM presents his theory of wholeness. Apart from some general considerations, the book turns out to consist of two ’parts’. One part is about the theory of hidden vari ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Heisenberg Uncertainty principle: (ab ≠ ba) and Electron. ==. Sir Arthur Eddington wrote: We used to think that if we knew one, we knew two, because one and one are two. We are finding that we must learn a great deal more about `and’. Why? Because one (1) can be different from another one (1). Take electron - symbol (e) Take proton - symbol (p) They are absolute different particles. And interaction between electron and proton is not the same than interaction between proton and electron: ep ≠ pe ( non-commutative algebra. Heisenberg Uncertainty principle) ...
[retrieve this message]

---

White Shark, It is fair to say that your scientific ”facts” are actually opinion and can be effectively challenged. All of the old earth and old universe dating methods have been shown to be speculative. Dr. Sarfati at Creation Ministries International points this out in his book Refuting Evolution   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Think outside the Earth-box. a) We live in Earth- box and see that all electron’s (E=h*f) parameters become infinite ( E= ∞) in interaction with vacuum. b) It is forbidden by * The Law of conservation and transformation of energy/ mass* c) But according to Dirac there is another box: Vacuum’s holes-box (!) with virtual negative particles (- E=Mc^2) d) So, thinking outside the Earth-box I can suggest that electron (E=h*f) in Vacuum’s holes-box (!) somehow can transform into Dirac’s virtual negative particles (- E=Mc^2). This local negative energy (- E=Mc^2) fo ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Nature and Infinity. =. There are two separate infinite substances that exist in Nature: ”infinitely big” and ”infinitely small”. The infinitely big substance is Zero Vacuum: T=0K. ( spacetime continues forever) The infinitely small substance is Planck’s constant – - quantum of light - ( h, h*). These two constants are fundament of creation everything in Nature. ===.. Best wishes. Israel Socratus. =..   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Hi everyone, The spiritual physicist here. MY first question - I’ve tried these rings of Alex Chui and they do work ... only he says they shouldn’t be worn with metal (like copper?). Is there anyone that understands copper and Orgone here? I made some rings myself and they were made with copper. The design i’m trying to locate again because i lost it. I want to know where the design comes from and more info on them so i can make and help others who are dealing with pain. copper apparently is good for that. http://curezone.com/upload/_A_Forums/Ask_CureZone/IMG_20131220_171424_697 ... [Image Embedded Here]
[retrieve this message]

---

waves changes and form particle even your sound of your voice and you know it that is why it can say something to mean something. check it out. interesting.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Are you the author of these copy/pastes ? Scroll to top of the following page: http://www.intpforum.com/showthread.php?p=404101 http://www.intpforum.com/showthread.php?p=403955   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

What/where is the essence of quantum evolutionary theory ? In my opinion the essence is hidden in * The theory of Quantum Electrodynamics*. As the QED is studied interaction between energy (photon/electron) with matter so it needed to pay attention on these two parallel ways of quantum evolution. ==.. *The classical physicist (biophysicist) * must all time keep in the mind the Planck’s constant because the life /evolution begins on the quantum level: h , h*=h/2pi , QED. ==.. israel socratus   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? ===… There is a conception of *evolutionary cosmology* There is a conception of *evolutionary geology* There is a conception of *evolutionary biology* There is a conception of *evolutionary zoology* There is a conception of *evolutionary psychology* . . . . . . .etc But there isn’t conception of *evolutionary physics* # There is a part of science which we call ‘ biophysics ‘. Is it possible what one part of this science ‘ bio’ has evolution and the other part of the same knowledge ‘ physics’ has not a conception of evolution ? ...
[retrieve this message]

---

The photon and the electron are one and the same particle in different conditions. =. In every physical text-book is possible to read that the photon and the electron are very different particles. What do we know about them? About photon Einstein wrote: ‘ All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, ’What are light quanta?’ Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. ‘ And we don’t know why the electron has six ( 6 ) formulas E=h*f , e^2=ah*c , +E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2 , E=-me^4/2h ...
[retrieve this message]

---

I still have not figured out what you are talking about. I once took a course in philosophy. The professor knew his subject more than anyone I have ever known. Problem was that his teaching and descriptions were so much over everyone’s head. Final grade was curved so far you could make 40% on tests and make a passing grade. I do not think he impressed anyone in his class. I bring forward what I posted 14 months ago when you asked the same question: what is a vacuum? ____________________________________________________________ Apparently a vacuum is the space between my ears. I hav ...
[retrieve this message]

---

I am just a quantum beginner but as I understand it the issue is that, according to our equations, the orbits of the electrons around the nucleas of every known atom should be decaying and would be falling into the nucleas. Over time, and there has been plenty of time for it to happen, all those ”known atoms” would not exist in the state we see them in now after the orbiting electrons crashed. And yet, all this matter continues to exist in a stable state. Whyyyyyyyy? And that is the basis of quantum theory.... to explain why, to identify the other forces that keeps atoms stab ...
[retrieve this message]

---

The god probably came up with the rating system used to decide which equations and theories to include in this ”top ten” list eh? It seems a bit self-serving, like it is giving the god an excuse to say ”Hark! Behold my greatest works - hear them live on Letterman Tuesday night, with special music guest Elvis coming back, at my command, for this one performance only” god Can be so irritating, with him its always like ”no matter how well the universe seems to function on it’s own, I can always get some believer guy to say ’na-uhhh, god did that’ - and all that the intellectuals can say ...
[retrieve this message]

---

I love DMSO, have been using it on occasion since about 1974.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---