Re: A mark of Quantum Gravity.

I am just a quantum beginner but as I understand it the issue is that, according to our equations, the orbits of the electrons around the nucleas of every known atom should be decaying and would be falling into the nucleas. Over time, and there has been plenty of time for it to happen, all those "known atoms" would not exist in the state we see them in now after the orbiting electrons crashed.

And yet, all this matter continues to exist in a stable state.

Whyyyyyyyy?

And that is the basis of quantum theory.... to explain why, to identify the other forces that keeps atoms stable...

OR - crazier stuff explains it - such as the idea that we exist only as charachters in a holographic computer program, and so the math doesn't have to work out.
OR - a universe with stable matter [atoms] is just a memory... we have been around a long time, we remember stable matter, but our own atoms were scattered with all the rest, but memory is not dependant on stable atoms IS IT??
{I just thought up this "memory" idea now - but it is a good one, isn't it? I am proud of it, you cannot refute it so easily unless you can guarantee that memory exists only as living tissues... it might, but we are not certain of it are we?}

Tweet