Yeah Here's My Comments I Sent To Them

Your article called "4.2.2 AIDS: Ozone / Oxygen, Prepared by Martin A. Majchrowicz" at
http://stason.org/TULARC/health/aids-hiv/4-2-2-AIDS-Ozone-Oxygen.html
is misleading and flawed. At least he researched it a little and seems to have gotten the first few paragraphs right. The rest of the article shows he has no working knowledge or experience with ozone.

The author ignores the many flawed "theories" used by our health care system, (and himself) which cures pretty much nothing, and has fallen to honorable ranking of 40 something on the list of world health rankings. One reason is because of articles like this one. The author shows his only intention in writing the article was to discredit a therapy he knows little about.

He says in one place "The most simplistic of these theories is that since disease-causing organisms, including viruses, die in the presence of
high concentrations of oxygen", implying it doesn't since it's a theory, and says "Known as a strong oxidant, ozone can be used in the water purification process as a method of killing bacteria and other microorganisms in the water supply." The fact is, it's not a theory. It's been proven over and over for more years than drugs have been around. It's not a theory and he proved it. (Oh I wasn't supposed to notice that right?) Oh yeah, I'm not supposed to know the EPA approved it for killing bacteria, virus, molds, fungus, and critters in food too right?

If you really want to get to the bottom of this therapy either try it, or find someone who uses it. (Not used it. Big difference) Or actually contact someone who has been cured from the "incurable". You can come and talk to me! You can see how it's used. You can see someone who is alive because of ozone. Unless your goals are other than the truth, in which case I hope you can sleep at night knowing you are helping people die needlessly.

HERE'S THE FACTS
My wife had breast, liver, and intestinal cancer. 16 tumors total. Doctors said 6-12 months. She found a experimental chemo therapy with a "80%" cure rate. After 9 months of this poison her body was starting to shut down and was told to go home and get her affairs ready. We decided to try ozone despite what the EPA and ignorant people like this author say about ozone. 3 months later she was cancer free.
We stopped using ozone and after a year or so she got a tumor in her intestines and bile duct. Doctors said there was nothing they could do since it was "chemo resistant". We started ozone again and guess what? Approximately 3-6 months later she was cancer free again! By the way she's the only one out of 54 who is still alive after using the chemo with a 80% cure rate. After what the doctor saw with all this, he said they should hire me. He couldn't believe it.

Anyway, this author can claim there is no "scientific evidence" showing ozone cures cancer, but that doesn't mean anything since they rarely research it. The author offers no reason why there is no scientific evidence either does he? He also doesn't say that that doesn't mean it doesn't work either. He proved his point of view, which is all he did. The article wasn't trying to prove anything but that ozone is bad. Now here's something you can stick in your pipe and smoke.

"Ozone Selectively Inhibits Growth of Human Cancer Cells
From Science magazine Vol. 209, 22 Aug 1980, pp. 931-933

Abstract

The growth of human cancer cells from lung, breast, and uterine tumors was selectively inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by ozone at 0.3 to 0.8 part per million of ozone in ambient air during 8 days of culture. Human lung diploid fibroblasts served as noncancerous control cells. The presence of ozone at 0.3 to 0.5 part per million inhibited cancer cell growth 40 and 60 percent, respectively. The non-cancerous lung cells were unaffected at these levels. Exposure to ozone at 0.8 part per million inhibited cancer cell growth more than 90 percent and control cell growth less than 50 percent. Evidently, the mechanisms for defense against ozone damage are impaired in human cancer cells."

The author of the article on your site says that just because it works in test tubes doesn't mean it works in people. YET IT DOES!

One more point. To say there are two deaths associated to ozone is a flat out lie. Where is his proof anyone actually died from ozone? They may have died AFTER using ozone, but there is NO PROOF ozone caused it. That's like saying after a car broke down after changing the oil, that changing the oil in your car is associated to cars breaking down. That's a classic example of how scientific evidence can be used to flat out lie. To mislead, and to hide the truth.

The statement saying there is no proof on HOW ozone works implies it doesn't too. Who cares how it works. Fact is it does work period. Scientific minds get so lost in counting the leaves and branches on a tree, that they fail to see the forest. I could go on and on, on how ignorant the author is on the subject of ozone, and they are many, but what's the point? This email will get deleted and ignored because of pride anyway.

I hope if he gets cancer he has the guts to stick by his words when the cut, burn and poison methods of conventional medicine don't work and he's told to go home and die, and that he won't come to me for help, even though I will. I hope he's man enough to say he at least might or could be wrong. I hope the owner of this site is man enough to say the same about the article. I believe your site owes humanity an apology, and should retract the article on the front page of your site, and as a show of sincerity provide a link to my wife's story and my article on ozone which is on over 20 sites. I make NO money for helping others. Can any of you say that? Now tell me who has the conflict of interest?

By the way. I met another person today who cured their cancer with ozone. Imagine that. The truth is out there if you have eyes to see. Scrap the scientific garbage that can be used to show what ever point of view you want to present, and come to the real world that is.
Tweet