Re: Question - Marriage - vulcanel

A major target for the Marxists was always the more-vulneralbe females. Once corrupted by propaganda into no longer believing that men and women were compliments, but "equals", many women effectively became the males' worst enemy. While many good men still sleep with the enemy, there are millions of genuine women out there and I know several of them. In the now-disenfranchised Western culture, women had always enjoyed special privileges. Doors used to be opened for women and men would give up their bus seats. They were shielded from legal liabilities, which the man took responsibility for. In my childhood neighborhood, any person laying one finger upon anyone's sister, or mother, would soon be taught the error in that. Women dictated whether intimacy would be allowed and thereby providing a stabilizing factor relative to the "sow your wild oats" drive of the immature male. History is replete with strong women who didn't let a little thing like a political system, or any man, keep them down.

But alas, somewhere along the line women were coaxed by propaganda into wanting "equality" which was a way of throwing away their advantages and today men and women complain about the resultant effects of "equal" interactions, such as the effect of two-income families where junior is carted off to be raised by a group of strangers in a day care center while mommy is working for aliens. One result is the creation of a faction of those who have an inherent need to be treated as women, but who cannot behave as women, but for the artificial constraints imposed under the Marxist system, which destroys families and drives a wedge between men and women, purportedly under a banner of equality, and a promise of, .... what does it promise ?

I criticize certain varieties of female but I do recognize that far too many males have failed to be men. In the absence of a man, a female finds it very difficult to be a woman. A man is one who leads and that leadership is bestowed according to his word, steadfastness, and general sense of dependability and honor. The true man cares about the world his children will inherit. That is why he is very cautious as to whom he shares his bed. If a man views a woman as nothing other than something with which to play "bury the weenie" then one is not much of a man.

I’ve seen a lot of males arguing with women over this and that. The argument alone suffices to sum it up. The woman argues because she does not respect who and what you are. You argue back because you need, like a little boy, something from her -- usually a flop in the sack which is about all I can think of at the moment. The women argue with their children thus demonstrating to the small ones that she can not lead them by herself. From fatherless households we generate a gaggle of obnoxious, arrogantly ignorant, untrustworthy males who can only demonstrate a modicum of bravery when the odds are in their favor. A mom cannot teach a boy how to be a man.

I’ve observed far too many males treating women psychologically as whores and/or property -- something to screw, bring home money and parade about as a conquest. With a land filled with 'men' such as these, is it any wonder why there are so many discontented females? Women follow, and since there is not much worthy to follow, they flap their gums, become demanding and take to the “equality" road. The males sense that they no longer are in charge of much of anything. Therein lies the seed of blaming someone, or something else -- other than themselves -- be it Bin Laden, conspiracies, immigrants, fluoridated water, ozone holes or jock itch. Many men have become prostitutes. They do not rent their bodies but they do sell their souls, honor, word and just about anything in order to satiate their desires whether it be material wealth, greed or steady sex. Until some backbone is developed, no organization or program will ever turn a turd into something worth calling a comrade.

In all fairness to men, let me say that we certainly have plenty of wayward females who view men as "sex toys". They favor one stud for a time (one night to six months), tire of him and then search out another. Except for the "dick" and assorted monetary advantages such as dinners, and clothes, they view all men as apparel to be donned whenever the itch arises. Woe be to the man who marries one of these psychically frigid women. They are an extremely self-centered and selfish lot. Hardly the type for motherhood or anything else, unless you are also living in the gutter.

Sparta never used single men for their warriors. They would only accept married men who had at least one child. In this way, they preserved Sparta. In today's wars, the best of the single men are consumed thus guaranteeing down breeding from the loss of the best blood. It's heaven on earth -- killing the best of the goyim and making a profit while doing so -- right out of the Talmud. That ensures a perpetual shortage of men, and hence a shortage of stable families and civilized society. Ever wonder why it’s falling apart ?
Tweet