Re: Peach ...

Perhaps you do not understand that even this would not happen without sunlight...
Perhaps you do not understand what ML is writing, though it may not be your entire fault; after all the man could not pass a 3^rd grader’s writing class.  He cannot communicate in English.

Sunlight is not being left out; according to our dearly deluded despot, “electro-magnetic Energy” is the energy of “many Different Alkaline Minerals and Acids” which is “Slowed down enough to convert” it into matter.

I believe you may be thinking too hard... it is not at all that difficult and your math is limited by man's thoughts and explanations of these things,
Now that is just dumb.  How do you suggest we do math that is not limited by man’s thoughts?  You are turning into ML, stating the obvious and then trying to make it seem “deep”.    Unless you have a better equation to show us, then you have nothing to say about the math.  I suggest you start by proving Euclid’s postulates wrong and then go from there.

If you have alternative viable explanations please present them, nothing from ML has been worth one measly iota. It has all been junk.

Science is found to be wanting on so many occasions over and over again.
So what!  It doesn’t mean we should accept the ideas of a certified moron just because our system of knowledge is occasionally wrong.   He offers nothing to prove that he is right and all you do is repeat the SOS about “science not knowing everything”

Though science has not proven wrong as you suggest, usually it is just not as right as we would like it to be.   And it is always as “Right” as the available evidence.

Your post is not entirely true when you state; "So, from your own links, matter is not created from "Electron-magnetic Energy" but rather obtained from the available water and atmospheric CO2."

You imply, but do not state that none of this would happen without sunlight... zip, nada, nothing... no life on earth.

That is not true, there are true chemoautotrophs that do not require sunlight and live off energy derived from inorganic compound many of these are found near thermal vents deep in the ocean.

The need for sunlight in photosynthesis is inconsequential to ML’s bogus ideas as he is suggesting that EM is converted into matter.  As is evident from the equation I did, this would require an enormous of energy and time to get enough energy to get 1 gram of matter.

Do not hand me another chemical equation without the use of some symbol for both light/radiation/electromagnetic energy, gravitational pull etc.

Well it its becoming evident you don’t understand them anyways, so I won’t waste my time.  Take a physics course and do your own math.  You will find how little you know of this subject and how ridiculous your demands are.

he does seem to have a knack for putting some things into rather simplistic terms that enable a layperson to follow along at the same time enraging the science minded...

Finally ML is not using simple explanations…. He is simply wrong.   I am beginning to doubt your grasp on reality.   To say that ML puts things in simplistic terms is a bold-faced lie.   He is wrong, no matter how you cut it.  It goes beyond his idiotic and incorrect use of simple words (alkaline, acid, isotope, ion, electromagnetic, protein, nitrogen), his ignorance permeates every sentence he writes and it infects every person that believes his.  It doesn’t matter if, as you like to say “science doesn’t know everything”; what we do know is clear and he is wrong, not doubt about it.   Anyone who buys into his foolishness will actually become dumber and dumber, better they leave their minds blank than fill it up with the garbage ML serves up.