Re: something different

It is very interesting. Some thoughts that came to me:

More so that the author suggests serious illnesses were caused by only a few paintings.
I wonder what the concentration / composition of the Iodine used by the physicians was.

There will always be refutational statements, why the Iodine Drs havent seen any of the problems presented in the article we can not yet know.

I recall a person on the Iodine forum being told by their iridologist to stop because of toxicity / damage being relayed to the iris.

However, Ive never been too keen with iridology as being the main method of diagnosing problems. There are many, many variables and it may present well for certain things (severe cholesterol) but Im not convinced by its effectiveness, especially after reading ex-iridologists views on the matter. Anyway, that is beside the point.

Surely, if these potential problems are likely they will have manifested at the doses consumed by the more ardent iodiners? Ive not made it past 50mg yet (with no noticable effects) but shouldnt you and V be seeing manifestations in the eyes of the streaks?

Im still unconvinced by the article.
What does it recommend for iodine tox? Bromine?

Thanks for posting this trap, we do need debate on this subject I think! Tweet