Re: Moderator Help Requested, PLEASE

I FAIL TO SEE HOW THIS THREAD BELONGS TO THE DEBATE FORUM..

Again I am stating the obvious-some alternatives do exit to Lugol/iodoral out there.
Now what I want to know and others as well is who on this Forum is using it ?

Also what are the results as compared to lugol/iodoral?

Are people mixing up the two ?

MDs that advocate Lugol/Iodoral- where are their studies in regards to the alternative treatments ? I want to know and others as well I think..

Finally I do not deny the effectivemess of Lugol/iodoral for the short -term and possibly mid iterm basis .

But for to state that since "Japanese people have been eating 25-50 mgs of iodine/iodide on a daily basis-those that are following the traditional diet and we can pinpoint variosu health benefits -like for women, few breast cancers,menaupause problems etc.."

But to somehow cocnlude that if one takes Lugol/iodine which is derived from a mineral one will have the same benefits...humm that remidns me of the various cancer treatments that are failing each time the scientists come up with another so-called miracle cure..

Conclusion ,the iodine/iodide derivied from the seaweeds,fishes etc is equivalent n NOT equal to iodide/iodine derived from potassium iodine..

Notes-I have asked a doctor(retired) if he could possibly look into the above;he is now advocating Lugol/iodoral.We will see what comes out of it..

If anyone haw had feedbacks from health professional that have switched their patients from iodiral/Lugol to one of the alternative products please do post it here..

I do urge people to be cautious and not go overboard with iodoral/Lugol.Not to overdo it.