Re: iodine experience

The foregoing article explains why protocols which promote ingestion of kelp, and other known sources of iodine, have had effective results reported. Most people are iodine-deficient.

Ingesting Iodine with chalk dust, or Iodine with sawdust, or Iodine with sand, or iodine with silica, or iodine with any other pharmacologically inert substance, is the same as administering iodine.


Understanding the true cause of what seems to be giving you a benefit, can lead you to understanding the true cause of what was causing you problms in the first place. That's a bit profound. I will call this
remedy diagnostics. It's diagnosing your problem, after you've alleviated it, by supplying the body with what was missing.

I propose REMEDY DIAGNOSTICS as a new principle. It goes like this: "We don't know what is wrong with you, but we're going to put into your body things which we know all people need. Then, we're going to watch your symptoms disappear, and diagnose based on that. Then we will treat you further, based on that diagnosis." Provided the substance administered does no harm, as iodine, in this case does not, there is no downside. Thoughts ?