Yes, and I found it rather dramatic but humorously entertaining. I don't have a problem with the data per say, although I tend to be skeptical of politicians and their so-called "data". Polys have an axe to grind and there is also data that is contrarian to Gore's (i.e. Artic temps were higher in the past, ice caps can be caused by trends in ocean currents, snow and ice accumulations in other areas of the ice caps are not reported so what is the true net gain/loss?). Propaganda too? Maybe so. Nevertheless, lets assume Gore's is accurate. My contention is simply this...It could easily be happening whether we humans were here or not, and that there isn't neccesarily a synthetic degradation of the environment that we need to "bounce back" from, but rather we are but tiny fleas at the mercy of the natural cycles of this great planet and solar system. To suggest we have any will over the Sun, the Earth, and planets around us I find difficult to believe. But maybe we'll find out someday? I suggest this will still be debated 25, maybe even 50 years from now depending on who needs power and money.