Re: Is Beck magnetic pulse a way to go?

Great question. Don't know if the answer is an easy one, but in part the answer is tied to another question - what are you after? Knowing whether you are after something specific versus something general may help decide which tools to apply.

Just using a simple analogy, if we take the relative few crumbs and snippets that survived Rife, he developed a technique that can be fairly described as a poinpoint zapper (loosley speaking) ... of laser-like precision, for which depth of effectiveness/penetration does not seem to be a question even on the radar for asking....because the Rife method was apparently that good!. Got a specific bug/pathogen to eliminate? Determine it's MOR, dial in the machine, apply the signal, bug/pathogen gone. Hulda and the subsequent wide realm of various Zappers, is an approach that, in comparison, is a scatter-gun or shotgun-like approach; shoot a wide enough pattern in hopes that something unfriendly will be eliminated. The basic Zapper shoots a fairly wide pattern, the advanced Zapper allows specific frequencies to be used, either way the Zapper does not necessarily penetrate very deep, so it ultimately beomes a matter of question of what?, exactly, does/did the Zapper hits & disable or eliminate? The general assumption being that a Zapper does hit/elimnate some bugs/pathogens, but which ones?, exactly, is difficult to pinpoint. The Beck electro-methods (bio-probe, and mag-pulsing), to compare, is a better shotgun, it shoots a different pattern but nonetheless a pattern that is relatively wide and in some cases one that penetrates deeper than do conventional Zappers.