Re: About Magnetic pulsers

I would not claim that I know it all because I don't. I haven't met one person that knows it all. If you look back to thread "My results with the MPG5", you'll see that I have tried the magnetic pulser and found it ineffective.

It appears that you didn't read that page, the beginning part says "This equation describes how a changing magnetic field produces an electric field and is almost an exact mirror image of Ampere's Law."

Doctors can certainly be wrong. I knew a doctor who told me that "a yeast is a mold". They told me "microbes can't live in the stomach because of the acid". So how exactly does H pylori colonize the stomach then? How do people who have compromised immune systems still end up getting fungal infections of their stomach even with normal acid levels? Today they'll claim that Arthritis is just an intreatable inherent auto-immune disorder, and tomorrow they'll learn that it may by induced by a bacteria like Mycoplasma. So are you saying oscillating magnetic fields don't have an effect on microbes? This document seems to be at conflict with that notion: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/ift-omf.html

No, CT scanners use X-rays, as the wikipedia page will tell you. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/CT_Scanner

"Computed tomography (CT), originally known as computed axial tomography (CAT or CT scan) and body section roentgenography, is a medical imaging method employing tomography where digital geometry processing is used to generate a three-dimensional image of the internals of an object from a large series of two-dimensional X-ray images taken around a single axis of rotation."