Re: Negative Voltage - confused help in India

Thank you for your answer. Perhaps Dr. Clark was suggesting the danger lies exactly in that: being less efficient. We live in a day and age where Cancer is killing 40% of all Americans, and is the leading cause of death. We live in an age where the U.N., WHO, etc. tells us that "avian flu" will kill millions in the near future in plague time. We live in an age where often heart disease, the number two killer of Americans, is actually parasite or pathogen caused or complicated.

Dr's Jeffery Sutherland, Richard Loyd, and Hulda Clark constantly strive for innovation, improvement, and efficiency. I assume you do too. Why would you want anything less than the best, and my assumption is you are suggesting that your research is shows differently than what Dr. Hulda Clark 's is, and that can happen, but I then begin to wonder about the differences in the research, etc. It brings serious questions to the issue. I understand that different researcher's have sometimes different findings, or different discoveries, and so forth, but in this case, I'd have to seriously question the difference, and why Dr. Hulda Clark makes this claim, and why you'd want to sell anything less than totally and most efficient.
Thanks again for your answer. As always, I am learning too.