Re: Official LA Superior Court Web Site Case Record

" Your personal attacking behavior, exposes great weakness and emotional desperation in your argument.

You behave as if you have a lot to lose here.

I'm just guessing."

Spoken like a true professional Pharma Troll in a typical arrogant, condesending fashion.
Whats the going rate for prostitution these days?
Seems like YOU have something to gain by discrediting the QXCI. To go to such great lenghts to do it too. Meanwhile parmaceuticals are literally killing thousands of people yearly, yet you choose this as your battle...interesting.

Wasn't it you that broke into a support forum and began attacking the QXCI and the man who invented it. Perhaps you should redirect your comments to yourself.

Your court record proves nothing other than The FDA's slanted power and insitance in paving a lopsided way for their Pharma collegues. They will go after a device like this (one they have no basis or interest in understanding) yet, leave pharma killing to run rampant.

Another major note is this is before the courts, it is biased due to the fact that it is one sided submission before a court and their has been no decision. The defence may have an entirely different account.

Perhaps you'd care to comment on why Aspartame is still allowed in our marketplace after the large amount of data compiled concerning its negative impact on health? Just one of thousnands of obvious examples of lopsidedness in the FDA's view on things. It is also important that the FDA is mostly made up of Phartma reps. Hmmm..can you say, conflict of interest?

You never really did comment on your great source, quack watch, that you used to begin your trolling tactics on this forum, did you?

It's also interesting that you have an aversion to "a course in miracles". How do you feel about other religious philosophies? Christianity for example.
Tweet