CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Evolution
 
supersport Views: 2,069
Published: 18 y
 
This is a reply to # 414,497

Re: Evolution


Golfegg, dismantling Darwin's theory of evolution is just a matter of disproving the mechanism. One of the biggest problems darwinists have is that their "GOD" is natural selection. Natural selection, of course, "selects" the random mutations. Over a period of time, these selections are supposed to build up new creatures.

but of course, if natural selection really DID make new variations, wandering away from the basic species.....then there would logically be no distinct species! Yet, instead, all we find in life today and throughout history are definite types of creatures. (this defies all evolutionary logic)

It is also known that all living creatures tend to keep coming back to the average. Even though varieties can be bred, if not continually guarded, their descendants will tend back toward the average. Scientists call it "regression toward the mean." The offspring of the gifted will move back toward the mean, or mathematical average.

In other words, how could millions of accidental "steps" build on top of each other to create a different species when "regression toward the mean" is fighting for the opposite effect???? (again this defies all logic)

Of course this is easily answered by creationists/IDists because we acknowledge that every creature has built in variety in the genome which enables quick adaptation to changing environments.

Also, Golfegg there's another problem....."Sexual Selection"


Sexual Selection is looked at in the same sense that "Natural selection" is, and it is another bogus idea used to explain a feature of organic life which simply does not exist.

In reality, Sexual Selection is completely nonexistent because (again) there is no selection made, because "evolution" by Sexual Selection does not have an outside influence which "directs" new species: all the actions of living organisms are an integral result of the DNA molecule and thus pre-ordained when that molecule is formed and before it begins life. Thus the Sexual Selection is not at all "random" or "intelligent", and therefore not explanatory in the sense that Darwinists want.

Sexual reproduction is an anti-evolutionary device...plain and simple.

These two features alone completely dismantle the evolution myth. S

P.S.....this says nothing to the fact that Darwin's theory is stupid on a common-sense level, genetic level, emotional level, and spiritual level.

Not only that, it cannot proven, it cannot be seen, it cannot be predicted, and it cannot be tested. Hows that for a bum theory? If you have information refuting this please give me the link. S
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.172 sec, (2)