Of course if you are anti-science (which you are) then you won't understand the nature of scientific arguments and evidence (which you don't). You don't even retain things. As explained before, management has a specific definition (like many other terms) in medical practise. Even if your contention WAS true (and don't try to twist my words to make out I'm saying its true) I see no evidence that, for example, the Liver Flush cures anything - or even does any good except for an endorphin rush.
Your argument boils down to this: Johng doesn't think your evidence is good enough so I will believe something for which there is little or no evidence. It comes back to Occam's razor again and again.