Re: Chelating with amalgams still in mouth
>>>>>>>>>if you don't remove the source of the contamination, then after chelation, through normal chewing and tooth usage, the mercury will re-enter and defeat the purpose of the chelation in the first place.<<<<<<<<<<<<
I don't think it defeats the purpose. You would end up with *less* total mercury if you do chelate and a head start on healing.
Amalgams do continue to deposit mercury into the body/brain, but a chelator would at least help the body to rid some of it. The whole purpose of chelating is to *reduce* the mercury and every little bit helps. Sometimes a slower rate of chelation is easier on the body, plus a chelator could grab some of the free mercury before it settles in the body/brain.
I was thinking of a continuous low-dose chelation while the
Amalgams are still in, and continuing of course after the
Amalgams are removed.
I don't disagree - it is just optimal to remove the source first. The body is constantly chelating and detoxifying - you can't stop it if you tried. I think it's best to give the body what it needs to do its job naturally. Blood is a colloid; modifying its zeta potential using natural substances is highly effectual.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Cilantro is not a chelator. Rather, it causes bacteria which are holding on to alkyl-mercury to release it. Cilantro contains no sulfur, carboxy, or amino groups capable of bonding to mercury.<<<<<<<<<<<
Do you see cilantro as a useful tool? And would you take cilantro and a sulfur together as an effective way to remove mercury?
Cilantro is a powerful tool if properly used, as it liberates methylmercury, which is what you want, but controlled. If your blood is conditioned to complex and eliminate all the liberated Hg, at the time of the administration of the cilantro, then you do good. Problems arise when blood capacity to complex and eliminate is less than the amount of Me-Hg liberated.