Re: got hair analysis back

> Hmmmmm do you know having said all that, maybe we should just use the chelation forum as that should encompass ALL protocols anyway. Since we're taking over all the other forums, why not just move to that one with more discussion about hair tests? Sorry for the lack of decisiveness!

Because if you don't mention Cutler or confine it to Cutler then chelation can be used as a springboard for just about anything. People could come on and say "chelate with product x,y,z" with no regard for whether:
1. x,y,z actually chelate
2. no knowledge of what the word chelate even means
3. no knowledge of whether x,y,z are dangerous to use

Also it would be nice to have a new forum - with no baggage, no history, no 4 month old messages with no replies. Something brand, spanking new. New just like the Cutler protocol. New just like the realisation that mercury may be behind many peoples seemingly intractable health complaints.

A new forum is the best way to alert people to a new possibility.

I'm only interested in chelation protocols which are safe and proven. The only protocol which fulfills both those is Cutler. However I am not so dogmatic to believe that Cutler answers ever single question or that he is right about everything. Some leeway is needed.

But not so much that the focus of the forum is taken away from safe, proven protocols towards unsafe, unproven protocols. Chelation is a highly specialist area not suited to "dabblers".

Sticking the words "Cutler protocol" gives a clear message: this is the main subject of this forum. It stops people coming in to be disruptive or to peddle their products. Its a polite way of saying - this is a support forum for people who are trying to chelate according to the Cutler protocol. If you have no knowledge of what the Cutler protocol is and have no interest in finding out, then do not enter. It also allows people who believe in other protocols (there are some) to continue discussing/posting on the other forums.

JV.