Re: bad news!!!

>- Zero Efficacy With Cesium Chloride Self-Treatment for Brain Cancer

My efforts were not double blind or even scientifically based, however, I did not use a misleading title as they did.

In order to claim any efficacy you need a reasonably large sampling. A sampling of one means that there is a 99 percent possible (and probable) error in the study.

I also assure you that first there have been others who have reported positive results that were definitely ignored and not published. Additionally, most people who use alternative therapies do not report them to their doctors and I know for a fact the certain doctors refuse to cooperate with anyone who uses alternative therapies.

Basically, this report (the title at least) is pure fraud and I am particularily disturbed that an institute such as the Mayo clinic would stoop so low.

They have seriously demoted their stature in my eyes.