I am merely showing that the poster said the following:
"Hello I have a friend with leukimia and i am going to propose for him to do something else than cemo, wich cures other than the recomended cleanses under ailments and protocols on curezone do recomend."
Again even after he made it clear that chemo was not his interest, you promoted otherwise.
"Depending on the lukemia, the chemo would likely be gleevac. I don't know much about this one, but it does seem to control the luk for many years. However, it does not cure, and every user of gleevac will eventually secumb to the disease. I also can't comment on the side-effects, since this is a chemo that I am unfamiliar with."
Interesting! It is important to note that the poster didn't ask for the info you gave and also of note is that you gave that upfront in your message hinting at the priority of the content in your message.
When a person at this site promotes chemo or any other toxic substance in the name of health, backing off will not be something I will be entertaining. I am starting to see a pattern to your posting. Mixing the good with the bad ruins the good.