Re: A few Questions

Ok, I don't know if I wrote it to you or someone else, but for evolution to be as evolution claims, the world would have to be a lot older. I lean towards evolution anyway, but I still require undeniable proof unlike you. I have MY undeniable proof of God already. None of this evolution or creation time lines mean anything between God and I.
Also it has been proven by Science that canyons as big as the grand canyon can be made in a period of a few years, so that argument is useless.
I'm not sure what you mean by your last statement. Could life have come from erosion? To tell you the truth, I don't know. It could have for all I know.
You were asking why I require so much from science. Just remember we're debating, and you are the one who is totally sold on evolution. So it's up to you to prove your side of the debate, and trust me, if you could show me some undeniable proof I would be a believer. You would think out of all the evolutionists I've debated with at least one could show something concrete proving it. Especially since they all say it's based on fact, they don't believe in myths, and all that stuff.
Something else, I just saw that new missing link they've been talking about on the news for the last week. The fish with legs? If that was proof, why haven't they used the walking catfish which have been around for a long time? Maybe because they have never evolved into anything but walking catfish?
Take Care Atalanta,
Gaylen