well, we all have our sources in order here - what are yours?

If Science is stupid, then you may be remotely right. But it is not, respectively you are not right; you just have a gruge on me because of my post about the dirt-nap and all (that one would have been funny, if it wasn't that irreverent) .
It is curious where you get your info- from the quack-watcher sites?
When someone doesn't have the facts to back their claims, it is all that easy to give dis-gracious qualifications.