Re: Pure silver is NOT toxic

RE: We did 'field trials'

Well this is precisely what the people need.
Now how about the data to go along with said field trials?


On the topic of field science, I'm open totally open to new things, and so that's not the issue.

What I'm not open to however, is putting my faith in products wrapped in fools gold. And to date, this is precisely what you seem to be touting on these forums. - Promises of information, explanations and/or evidence whilst directing people toward your product channels. To which I'd add, won't likely last much longer as this is not what the CureZone Forums are for. see: product marketing and/or exposure. Which applies even in cases of stealth marketing.

As for John Travolta, I see nothing in this particular testimonial that hasn't been seen with traditional Colloidal Silver . Which is precisely what I'm trying to determine here .

ie, In the video you posted at you first of your campaign, I saw nothing more than an Ionic Colloidal Silver generator. In fact, the bluish/white plume coming off the Anodes are tell-tail signs of an overloaded electrochemical process. And so as you can imagine, my specific point of interest in all of this is whether or not your product truly is something OR nothing more than a traditional Colloidal Silver doused in new terminology. To which I'd add, wouldn't take more than 15 mins to confirm once someone gets their hands on your Elixir. And less than a week to conclude whether it actually works if it is in fact different.

And that's exactly what we need here. A testimonial other than that of some random person coming into a forum offering the cure to all illnesses through a single channel.

Which raises some interesting questions...

How long before someone we know and trust gets to see the acclaimed product you've been field testing for 15 years?
Or more importantly, how much longer do you believe you can continue to promise information while directing Curezone members toward your website?