Re: ThunderVolt Zapper questions
Thanks for the insights. They are helpful.
However, I wasn't meaning to tout the testimonials as evidence that the zapper works well and as stated. I usually don't put much stock in testimonials for zappers or really any other product. However, the Thundervolt zapper's testimonials do have some unique qualities that don't normally come with fabricated ones:
1. There aren't very many of them.
2. They don't cover all the highlights of the zapper.
In other words, they don't really advertise it that much. They seem fairly straightforward how real testimonials would be. However, that could be faked, but I doubt they would have done that. Possible, but why? Why not make it look better and like they're not struggling to get a following? I don't know that most people analyze testimonials like that. I think at least one of the testimonials comes from a real person, from the searching I did to try to figure it out.
That's cool to know the idea of an algorithm to detect frequencies within the body.
Here's my idea of how it could be done. First, though, this relies on the principle (which I don't know whether it's true or false) that the 9v battery runs out of power faster when there are more pathogens in you to zap. (Someone said that once somewhere.) Anyway, all you'd have to do is have a frequency that counts down, and gauges which ones take more power to zap. Of course, I don't know if what that person said is true. It makes sense that it could be, but I don't really know if it's possible to draw more or less power from the device just based on what it's zapping. Do you know? However, it's possible that it only takes more power on big things like large parasites, and that it wouldn't stop a whit on bacteria. Could be wrong.
> The requirements for plugging to the wall are very stringent and not completely safe. While it may be a 1 in 10 million chance, how would you like to be the 10 millionth?
The Thundervolt zapper does have two models already: one with a wall plugin, and another for a 12v battery and/or solar panel (not included). Hence, I asked, why not just make one with both options? If people don't want to risk it, they don't have to plug it in. They describe how their wall plugin (not all zappers with wall plugins) is supposed to be safe. Apparently, they do some special stuff that isn't always done. I don't know enough about electronics to verify the safety, but, yeah, they have a claim that should probably be addressed by other people who know. The claim sounds good, though.