Re: Update

Yeah you should know better than assuming something is the cure just because it cured some people in the 1950s. Because other case studies we have seen haven't been helpful. Such as the Calendula Ointment case study I talked about in the same post.

How many cure stories and case studies have we seen? And how many of them have been "the cure"? Im just saying that just because there is a report that this cured some people 60 years ago means nothing.

If you want to continue believing every new treatment is the all powerful cure then go ahead, but its stupid. And by now you should know better. But I did forget that you are the one who brings up a new BS treatment everyday.

I have read a million cure stories and case studies that have proven to not work for others, so forgive me for not crowning this as the all powerful universal cure before it has even cured anyone in the past 60 years.

I mean we read about Mike Pylon curing himself right before our eyes and you still say that the treatment is just managing EC. And I'm crazy and negative for not crowning a treatment that was written about in a case study 60 years ago?

Hmmm.... Tweet