Re: Helpful Consumer Warning About QXCI

Here is my experience with the QXCI since I also own the program. I got mine used and I find that those who adamently defend it, were the people who paid $20,000.00 for the device when it was new. When you have that kind of investment in a machine, it is hard to be objective about it. You want to believe that is the best health discovery ever.

I can open the program and scan myself, close it down, open it again 5 minutes later do another scan and come up with a completely different set of health issues. I have heard the argument from QXCI patients and practitioners that the body is always in a state of fluctuation and that nothing is ever the same and can change in a matter of minutes. Unfortunately, I don't believe that in 5 minutes time, I can go from having Cancer to suddenly being cured and then having Lyme or some other Biological Warfare agent come up on the scan. I could run 5 scans in a row and each time I run a scan, I have a different health picture. I believe that the program lists so many things on it and that it is purely a random assignment of health issues. Because so many things come up in the program at least a few things will tend to resonate with the person who is being run on the program. Most clients are only run one time on the program so they would have no reason to doubt the authenticity of the information.

An even more scathing indictment of the program is the fact that I read about a Chiropractor who used a meter to test the frequencies emitted during the rife session on the EPFX and found that the only frequency coming off of the computer or Scio box was in the 60hz range which is what household appliances usually run at.

One of my friends who has a SCIO box,took the box apart in spite of Bill Nelson's warning of Karmic Consequences for doing so. (Gee I wonder why?) She found the box was basically empty except for a few screws and wires. My other Biofeedback practitioner friend was told in a QXCI workshop that the SCIO box was no longer necessary that the program would work just off of the computer. Could it be that many people had disected the SCIO box and found it to be useless? If this is the case, then why did Bill Nelson include the SCIO box to begin with?

There are just too many questions regarding this device and unfortunately, those who believe in it believe with the fervor of a religious zealot. I think most that defend this device have a lot of money tied up either in paying a practitioner $70.00 an hour or in purchasing the device. Tweet