Re: You just flunked
#136970,
your comment................
"By your own admission,
Oleander has 500 chemicals in it. Cooking them does not change the fact that they are "chemicals" which through human ingestion is chemotherapy and there is no way in the world that you Tony can dismiss the fact that you are promoting chemotherapy - the treatment you supposedly despise".
By your own definition then that means that the following "chemicals" are also "chemotherapy-drugs" and which are successful in cancer treatments........
Intravenous Vitamin C or Ascorbate (a nutrient)
Cholecalciferol or Vitamin D3. (a nutrient)
Iodine (a nutrient)
CoEnzyme Q10
..............and many many more that have a prophylactic and therapeutic use against cancer.
Most all the substances we ingest are chemicals, whether this be air or water or nutrients, so some rudimentary knowledge of biochemistry wouldn't come amiss here. Quite a bit different from the alleged "chemotherapy" from properly prepared
Oleander that you mention
What you fail to realize or understand is that although many drugs are derived from plants, pharmaceutical companies metamorphose these plant-derived chemicals into compounds that are then allowed to be patented, producing huge profits from their sale and use.
Oleander on the other hand is not chemically altered or metamorphosed chemically, but retains its original chemical form, and which by itself can be used therapeutically as a medicinal herbal extract against cancer in much the same way as the above.
I am sure that Tony has only responded to your posts because of your spread of misinformation about oleander, and is defending his position on that substance, as he is well-informed about this herbal preparation, even writing a book on its historical use and origins; he is also one of the most respected and knowledgeable members here.
You are in a distinct minority of one here, so your time could be put to better use on those things you know more about, rather than on those you are in ignorance of.
Chrisb1.