CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Mercury problems long after amalgam removal
 
Eric11 Views: 4,069
Published: 12 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,941,782

Re: Mercury problems long after amalgam removal


Some lucky people feel better simply from removing the fillings, but most people have to spend months of chelating the mercury out before they will feel improvement (6 months for me) and years before they've completely recovered. Somebody compared it to a leaking boat. Removing the fillings is like plugging the hole, but you still have to remove the water that's leaked in (chelate the mercury).

EDTA is good for lead. It's not so good for mercury. ALA is good for mercury. Occasional use is unlikely to help very much and may make things worse (you may end up redistributing the mercury instead of removing it).

I suggest you do a search for information about the Cutler Protocol if you are using ALA. You can do the protocol with DMSA and ALA, but there are many people out there who use ALA by itself.
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.059 sec, (1)