Re: MMS has given my life back!

Hello ST,

There lies the root of the problem...

While some people observe positive results from following the Miracle-Mineral-Supplement protocol, there is very little evidence that it works.

A few years back I did a survey on CureZone. I compared those who were taking Miracle-Mineral-Supplement internally with those who reported continuing positive results. Somewhere in the range of 2 - 3% of the people taking Miracle-Mineral-Supplement had continuing positive results.

Contrast this with studies done on the placebo effect where 30 - 40% of the people report continuing positive results.

However, when you look at topical applications, the results shoot up to 60 - 90%, and for some infections it always works.

In industry it works great. The major issues with using it in industry are the dangers involved with exposure to chlorine dioxide gas and the expense involved with sodium chlorite.

Inside the body there are other chemotherapy agents that are well studied and are more effective that MMS. MMS is kind of a "lite" version of chemotherapy.

With the problem in your jaw bone, it would be effective to open up the tissue, expose the infected bone, and treat it as a topical problem. However, there can be complications involved when doing this.

The "theory" that applying an oxidizer to an area close to the infection with the idea of the oxidizer passing through the tissue and arriving at the infected area with enough oxidation power left to eliminate the infection is easier to tolerate, but may not be as effective. Also, there are complications involved with this. In this case move from chemotherapy thinking to radiation thinking. What concentration is needed, and if that concentration is locally applied, what is the "fallout" that needs to be contained or delt with by the body.

The by product of chlorine dioxide is chlorite. In water purification chlorite is monitored and the chlorite level dictates the amount of chlorine dioxide that can be used for purification. When chlorine dioxide breaks down about 70% of it turns into chlorite. The remaining 30% forms chlorate and chloride with most of that being chloride. In animals, chlorite has a half life of a little over 40 hours, and it penetrates all the organs of the body including the brain. Chlorite is a free radical.

By the way, ozone is another oxidizer that can be very effective against infections, and it can be targeted to a specific area of the body. It will also penetrate tissue.

As far as administrating chlorine dioxide into the blood, testing has been done on this. The results indicated that blood plasma can be purified and disinfected, but the chlorine dioxide attacks blood cells so they have to be removed from the plasma before treatment.

There are some cases where killing off blood cells may help a little. Take malaria for example. Malaria infects blood cells. If you kill off the blood cells you can relieve the malarial load. The question is how many blood cells should you kill off, and what about the free radical load that is produced by the addition of chlorite to the body?

Chlorine dioxide is registered as an odor remover, as a pesticide and as a sanitizing solution. The medical community uses this and several other chemicals to disinfect and sanitize. These chemicals kill off everything and are very effective. However, when reviewing the interaction of these chemicals with human tissue, they choose to use other chemicals that are less harmful to the body.

A big piece of the puzzle is missing from all of this. If you went to your doctor with evidence, in the form of blood tests, showing the effectiveness of MMS and demonstrating that it was not harmful in the short run, your doctor may take this a step further. However, in spite of the claims of thousands and thousands of people that have been healed with a 97% success rate, and in spite of having those healing's confirmed in medical clinics and hospitals, there is no test data verifying this. When the clinics where he did his initial testing were contacted, they said they have never heard of Jim Humble, and if there was a miracle cure for malaria, they would be very interested in getting some information about it.

Who knows, when Jim Humble get his church set up and spread around the world perhaps he will find someone that can run some tests that verify some of his ideas... Priorities...

When you visit with your dentist, ask him if he has any idea on the CT needed to kill off your particular infection. Also, advise him that there is a difference in the ways the various chemicals work.

Chlorine dioxide is a gas and caution needs to be exercised when using it because it is a respiratory irritant. Chlorous acid is an acid that is used for topical use. It has some chlorine dioxide in it so the cautions that go for chlorine dioxide also need to be addressed when using chlorous acid. Sodium chlorite is a stable form of chlorine dioxide. The percentage of sodium chlorite is directly related to its PPM concentration. MMS is 28% by weight of 80% pure sodium chlorite. That ends up as 22.4%. This gives you a concentration of 224000 PPM. For reference water purification uses less than a 2 PPM concentration.

Tom