*facts* are only as good as the source that they come from...
And then, facts are often deceptive as I have pointed out in another post in this thread... such as *safe* levels being continually adjusted up as it becomes apparent that we are stuck with certain levels due to prior pollution.
Similar to all of the Genetically-Modified foods that have been, and are grown, in *experimental* and *contained* conditions, that then get into, and contaminate the food supply, let alone into the wild, only to get *emergency* government approval without ever having to do health OR environmental impact studies. Genetically-Modified rice in the U.S. being perhaps the latest example.
Whoops... too late.
Given the past history of both industry and government... would you trust the source of any said *fact*, to be honest and accurate?