Re: Comparing Riboceine to N-Acetyl Cysteine for increasing glutathione levels

I am not dismissing it out of hand so much as dismissing it out of pocket.  It's main claim to fame in the MLM marketing hype appears to be increasing glutathione production.  Why pay 100 times more per 100 mg capsule for a supplement which provides over 1.5 times less glutathione production increase than does N-acetyl cysteine at 600 mg per capsule?  And even less glutathione increase than a coffee enema?

Thanks for your input.