Re: Lineup
PCR testing is better than convential testing. I would like to know why the doctors think that it is not superior, it confuses me.
Labs do not provide treatment options, that is up to your healthcare provider. But that is probably useless since most doctors do not know how to treat
parasites correctly. You can reference badbugs.org for this. The non human
parasite you mention just means that the taxonomy is unknown in which there are 2 possibilites::: 1. it truly is a non human
parasite and is passing thru the body or 2. it is a species that has yet to be identified as a pathogen. If you read the report carefully you will see they mention if signs of an infection persist, it should be treated as a human pathogen. There are reports that variations of protozoa can occur such as b hominis sub-species, thus rendering the above.
It would be no surprise that the yeast and/or bacterial dysbiosis would occur with a
parasite infection. These
parasites evoke very strong immune reactions and create a very hostile environment in the gut (read Dr. Leo Galland material). These evoke strong immune reactions that create much oxidative damage and change the environment dramactically. For instance beneficial e-coli (this is the pathogenic variety) is the major pro biotic in the colon and low populations of this have been correlated to very sick people (Dr. Jonathan Wright). Once the protozoa have been eradicate then the bowel environment will return to a normalizing state.
Perhaps rather than chasing endless lab testing, treatment would be a better option. However in some cases of protozoa infections, identification of the species is necessary in order to tailor effective drug treatment protocols - see badbugs.org. Different species require different approaches, for instance b. hominis will not be eradicated by Flagyl but requires a triple drug cocktail including lumicidal drugs such as Diloxinide Furoate. D Fragilis requires Iodoquinol etc.
You colon will never achieve balance until the
parasites are removed.