Re: very interesting

i was hoping someone would chime in with that. i think thats a dandy idea.

so many men, myself included, were horribly abused as infants. this abuse is the extreme circumcision that is done. its not for religious reasons as such. the original circumcision in the jewish faith was symbolic in nature and did not disfigure the person or rob him of the function of the foreskin. that was changed long ago because jews were able to pass for gentiles if they did not show their scar. the rabbis thought this to be a hindrance to the faith and began to modify their procedures to remove all doubt with the finished product.

it was during the time of dr kellog and his colleagues that the idea was brought forward to circumcise boys in such a way that they could not easily spank the monkey and ruin their souls in the process. they claim hygiene as the excuse today but its just a scam to make a buck on another procedure, the origins of which have been tainted for a very long time.

the results for the victims... yes, victims. everyone gasps in horror at circumcising females. what is so much more humane about circumcising males? and the damage it causes? it ruins sex for both partners in many ways. it is worse for the male, though, because he looses the sensitivity in the glans(head) from being rubbed in clothing instead of protected inside the skin. some researchers have theorized that this makes all sex except full insertion and thrusting for the person of little pleasurable value and may have contributed to many rapes along with less pleasurable playing with yourself, spanking the monkey.

i have read non-tantric articles also talk about learning to orgasm without ejaculation. that would be one way to address the issue, for sure.