Re: 2 hrs later... all credibility lost?
Ya, Paul that is just too incredulous:
- the girl, Natalie, reportedly appeared perfectly healthy but had "a large malignant tumour of unknown origin in the heart and lungs" , and then died within TWO HOURS of the jab.
Uh huh. It was purely coincidence that a tumour grows for a couple years and then kills her THEN. Not two hours BEFORE, just THEN, after the jab.
What kind of credibility do these doctors and spokespeople and news media expect to have after reporting it like this?
Here in Canada, the national news said it with a straight face and didn't question the timing at all. How about "even though the coincidence was extraordinary, the coroner insists that it was the tumour that killed Natalie". Nope. Just "the tumour killed Natalie". No family were interviewed to give their opinion, nothing.
And Natalie "appeared perfectly healthy".
OK, so they authorities have no credibility left. Do most people still swallow everything they are told by medical authorities? Unfortunately, YES!!!
By the way, the HPV
vaccination program was quickly HALTED in Canada after this news - same in England, right? - but then the tumour excuse comes out and the program is put back on right away, the next day. No time to investigate, no further study needed. BOOM, right back on.
So now we have a whole other group of authorities - the schools doing the programs - without credibility.
The whole question of government paying for these
vaccinations is curious. Government money straight into the hands of Pharmagiants. They justify it on the basis of "saving the public health system money", but the vaccines are said to cause other cancers!!
Quote: "Gardasil vaccine has been linked to a 44.6% increase in precancerous lesions in women"
So it will COST, not save.