H is right - Moritz idea is bunk

You can see my response to Mortitz's latest book about cancer being a survival mechanism instead of a disease here:

http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1472370

I have to agree with Hveragerthi - what Moritz is saying is pretty much junk science.  If cancer is a survival mechanism then nature surely did get it screwed up!  Cancer is nature gone awry, a disease plain and simple. The novel idea of it being a survival mechanism may sell a lot of books, the same as Tullio Simoncinin's bogus claim that cancer is a fungus, Hulda Clark's mysterious flukes, and the fad book about all cancer being the result of past unresolved traumatic experiences, but it is not in my opinion a valid idea in any respect - other than perhaps one might correctly state that cancer is a defense mechanism on the part of cancer cells themselves, which seek to protect themselves from being destroyed by the natural immune system and in the process destroy the host.

The best cancer treatments are those that either destroy the cancer cells or else convert them back to normal cells so that they die a natural programmed cell death as well as addresses the root cause that enabled cancer to gain a foothold in the beginning to prevent its return.  THAT is a survival formula for the host and death for the cancer, which sees the host only as an organism to invade and feed off of.

DQ