Unethical Moderation

To maintain credibility in this site I would like everyone who participates in these postings to look at the ratings of "recommended" articles.

See who's articles get the most RECOMMENDed. See whos articles have nevere been recommended. It stares you right in the face.

Also, what is proof!

None of the testimonials here are proof of anything. All the advocating in the world doesn't constitute proof for ozone, sutherlandia, peroxide, oleandrin, etc.

Links to clinical trials, links to actual patients, research done all over the world with links have been posted to demonstrate merit for all of these therapies, of which I have openly promoted and never discouraged.

However, recommendations made by myself with respect to cesium chloride are done by a person who has identified himself, posted his address and phone number, complete identity is known.

To preserve and protect curezone credibility I would like to ask for the last time.

Please do not discourage people away from alternatives that actually have measurable testing (linked,) logical hypothesis on mechanisms,(explained by experts,) credible testimonials that are no less credibly than the thousand of all the other testimonials reference herein. In fact, more credible than most of testimonials. This is why I respect Tony's opinions more than others on this site!

In a court of law, when all the evidence is gathered and put all together, pieces of a puzzle become apparent and paint a picture. This is called proof!

I have done that with the bulk of my postings on cesium chloride. Together they paint a very clear and obvious picture.

The very first trial of cesium chloride done by Dr. Keith Brewer had a 100% response rate. This link was provided.

Why do we go any further? End of debate. Why aren't we all buying cesium?

Now, I don't know about anybody else, but you shouldn't attempt to minimize 100% of anything, unless you want to look like a complete baboon.

Limitted trials,...sure!
Shoddy definition of "response,"....yup!
Case histories hard to validate,...they all are!

And still,....minimizing this statistic only serves one purpose! ...an unethical purpose that clearly hurts the credibilty of the persons minimizing 100%.

You know! There is no room to go after you reach 100%.

I do not know if curezone has moderators with an agendas or not.

What I do know is that there is clear, present biased with respect to the way some articles get scored "recommended" and there is clear and present biased with which treatments get knocked and which one's get promoted.

I do think that right now this web site has come to a crossroads and how the moderators respond, (not with words but with actions,) will determine the entire credibity, goals, and objectivity of this website. These will be gravely tested!

People functioning in capacity as an expert on this site should never talk out both sides of their mouths, they should not be a pot calling the kettle black, they should not be criticle of treatments for cancer that can never be as dangerous as cancer itself.

They should not discourage people from taking anything unless there is complete and total widely accepted proof that the treatment is worse than the disease.

Now, I have posted cesium links, studies, sworn to personal experiences and supported its merits as a potential tool in the war on cancer. A valuable tool!
But I shouldn't have to if you all would just read Dr. Brewer's first clinical trial.

I have never discouraged anyone away from any therapy here except maybe zeolite. (Who needs aluminum.)

I have never knocked any therapy but have offered cheaper alternatives to look at and think about, all the while acknowldeding the merits of the more expensive alternative.

I don't knock diet, I do point out the active ingredients of those diet foods and ask that we try and dose those ingredience. Why? the question is Why not?

If the rhetoric in this website does not change and soon, I will post a complete and total page on my own website devoted to warning people about curezones slanted, twisted nature.

People are not stupid, they can read.

I don't get as much traffic on my site as curezone but I did have over 30,000 page clicks last year.

Look!

Cancer is a disease that we should all be sensative to.
This site draws in scared, hurting, terrified, desperate people.

When they see someone bashing a protocol splitting hairs on technicalities, arguing back and forth,....well then this website has done nothing but cause even more confusion, more deseperation and more fear!


Nice Work!

Sincerely
Bret Peirce,...American Cancer Advocates Tweet