Re: --The Facts are in about Hveragerthi--Edited

I question that the many good, decent, inspired men who have doubted, or not yet experienced Christ and contributed much to society were not "of God" or of "Christ" and still allowing God to work through them to further progress. Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Einstein an atheist or agnostic until later in life post e=mc2? But did he not allow God to work through him intuitively and give humanity a great gift of knowledge that we now use as the fundamental basis for this protocol today? And I doubt that a God of Love and Mercy would not claim any part of His Creation as His, because as God is Intelligence, and Energy how could any of us delude ourselves into thinking we can possibly be separated from Him?

"deny"-Middle English denien, from Old French denier, from Latin dēnegāre : dē-, de- + negāre, to say no.]

There seems to be a great difference between doubting, as many good people including myself have at some period in their lives (if I may put myself in that category) and "saying no" to Christ. The latter implying first a knowing, an understanding, and then an outright refusal to accept Christ, as is demonstrated by the story of the Angel Lucifer which in turn gave birth to evil as we know it. Of course it goes without saying that many of our televangelists, priests and others who claim to be of God have certainly demonstrated through their actions where their allegiance lies.