Is Cutler's "science" legitimate?

Hi - after reading through Cutler's books "Amalgam Illness: Diagnosis and Treatment", and "Hair Test Interpretation: Finding Hidden Toxicities" - I am ambivalent. I mean - my initial reaction was one of hope that his research/knowledge was a wonderful beacon of hope that I may have discovered the answer to my devastating troubles. But now, some skepticism has crept in about the overall validity of his publications. The books are chock full of info that is so unique - plus the sheer volume and format of the presented information "read" like it is possibly the arbitrary ramblings of a quack. Reading these books causes me to wonder how Cutler, and Cutler alone, figured all of this stuff out. Either he is an amazing genius or a wacko quack!

The concepts of "deranged mineral transport" and the different set of "rules" he came up with to identify deranged mineral transport seem especially random and arbitrary. How did he scientifically verify that there is a such thing as "deranged mineral transport"? And it seems as though there are enough "rules" that define deranged mineral transport that pretty much EVERYONE would be covered - that is, everyone would quite probably have a test result that meets one or more of the required rules for deranged mineral transport.

Don't get me wrong: I have no personal agenda, no personal motive to discredit Cutler's work. I am just someone who is trying hard not to get suc***ed in by a "rainbow" of pseudoscience. To take the steps necessary to undergo Amalgam removal would mean *tremendous* effort and sacrafice on my part - and I want to be sure that my struggles would be based on something much more solid than flawed pseudoscience or an elaborate money-making scheme.

So can anyone provide any proof that Cutler's work is legit, and scientifically-sound? Tweet