Re: No dark side to Kauffman

I have no problem with Kaufman, other than he failed to do his research and ask the hard questions that Simoncini needs to be confronted with.  As for his book, there are a great many books that lay out their theories quite well that I nevertheless do not completely agree with.  Due to the fact that Cancer thrives in a non-alkaline environment and often has problems in an alkaline one, the same as does fungus, items like baking soda can have a positive effect.  I think cancer often exists at the same time as fungus and that perhaps fungal infections can result in cancer, but that such is not always the case.  In many instances fungus actually comes into play long after the cancer has started.  It takes some cancers up to eight years to gain a foothold and develope to the size of a pinhead in people who otherwise appear healthy.  I seriously doubt that a person can have a serious fungus condition that long without it manifesting itself.

The way Simoncini cavalierly treated one of my Yahoo forum members would be enough for me to disregard him - and there is a great deal more out there.

DQ