Re: Stabilized Oxygen
Ya know, Jon, are you deliberately misunderstanding or are incapable of understanding or maybe you're somewhere in the middle.
In your post regarding whether or not ppm is a "valid" or important measurement when preparing the poison for ingestion, you simply said that it doesn't really matter what the ppm was.
So I disagreed with that and responed as such, my focus being that ppm is important because that measurement is a way to keep track of the stregth and amount actually ingested. There is no other way to know how much of the various parts of ClO2 are in your very clean glass of water at any time.
This is what you wrote and it is to what I responded (from the earlier post):
"The point is Bruce is using his ClO2 for a specific application and requires a certain amount of ppm to get the job done in a specific time.
Inside the body it is totally different. Whether you dilute the stuff with a cup or half a cup or whatever the amount that ends up in the blood is at a ppm that has not a lot to do with the ppm you drank it at."
Your response to my response (this is getting complicated but accuracy is important):
"If you put a teaspoon of
Sugar in a cup of water or a pint it's still a teaspoon though the ppm is very different."
This, for starters is a different scenario than your original post At no point did you include the concept of having a controlled amount of substance, whatever it is, although
Sugar doesn't behave like ClO2 in water.
I think you added some additional information to make your response sound "better," more condescending, and seemingly more rational: that the amounts of mms taken would be the same regardless of the amount of the medium in which it is put.
You're right, whether the same amount of
Sugar is put in one or two cups of water, it is the same amount of the original substance added. Now, I have no idea whether or not the unique properties of sugar would allow the sugar to remain in the same state or not. Liking to bake, I'm aware of how sugar reacts in various situations, but generally, people don't soak it in room temperature water.
Also, it generally takes longer to drink twice the volume (but who's keeping track of this) so there might very well be differences in any number of ways between these two samples. With mms, you know that letting it sit for 3 minutes will produce certain attributes and it sitting for 5 minutes will produce a different set of attributes. Also, when working with ClO2, I tend to think that the volume of the medium would have an effect. It's highly reactive and at the very least, it would seem that it is possible that the reaction might be faster as the molecules bump into more of its neighbors, but that it only a guess on my part. Perhaps somebody who knows could address that (Bruce.....) as I would find that very interesting.
From your earlier post:
"But it isnt important as Bruce thinks it is.
No way is it going to be the same ppm in the blood as is needed outside the body to kill the pathogens so the immune system must be involved in doing this as well and to a much greater extent than normal so it would seem"
You seem to be blinded by "Bruce rage" (complaining, really?, oh boy) I enjoy the last part of your post: "so it would seem." No one has the information, we've talked about this until near death and apparently you seem to agree that people don't know what happens in the body. So your posts become the musings of a person who is just making it up as he goes along. Very dangerous, especially to others who may actually believe you know what you're talking about. That could be tragic indeed.
As far as Tom, he doesn't know either, he doesn't like to admit it either, but sometimes he will. WE DON'T KNOW HOW CLO2 BEHAVES IN BODIES. Please, deal with it and don't try to drag anymore people into this mess.
Please stay within generally accepted debate guidelines, as in do not respond to someone as though some new information you added was available to the person to whom you are responding. Add it after response. Okay?