Re: My head is still spinning trying to figure this out

Thought I already answered most of those :)

Nothing stops you from manually entering the frqs, the F165 and for this the F125 would do just fine simply makes it easier so you can snooze while running lengthy scriipts.
It also allows you to fuzz a little by that we mean wobble around the frq you are targeting. But really nothing that can't be done with your fingers :)

As for sweeps you can simply use HC's frqs from the NCFL:
http://www.electroherbalism.com/Bioelectronics/FrequenciesandAnecdotes/Non-Co...


As an example:
Taenia solium (scolex) 444000 448900
With the F125/165 you could simply enter:
dwell 45
sweep 444000 448900 100
and the machine would spend 45s on each 100hz between 444000 448900.

But if you bring up Excel and enter the first number then the another +100, and use the fill feature you can print out those numbers then use a kitchen timer to remind you to change.

NOTE: An octave of frqs is just like on the piano, a C is a C even if the octave is higher or lower. When you are listening to a piano the C sounds alike but the depth of vibration is different depending on the octave you play. The same thing goes for Rife; you can go up an octave by multiplying by 2 and down an octave by dividing by 2. They are the same frq but with different depth.

So for instance the Taenia solium (cysticercus) number I gave you is actually 475300 only 11 octaves lower, for me HC’s number was off by ~300hz, 475300/(2^11)=232.08. 232.07 worked best, which is off by 100th of a hz, though this could be because the EMX isn’t accurate to 100th of a hz.

Since my F165 is setup to run multiples of the same frq in different octaves on each different channel, I often switch channels back and forth to see which works best. In the case of Taenia solium I use the lower frq for the cyst but I use HC’s frqs multiplied by 2 (one octave higher) for the body.