Re: Wow, Roky, I just can't agree with you

Agree. I'm with you, Donna.

To get a little more glimpse behind this notion of population control, you may want totake a look at another article posted just recently


//www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1144568


Bear in mind this is now 10 year old information but it does provide a brief look under the hood of who some of the titans are (or were 10 years ago) in the industry of "planned parenthood" methodology. Back then, Bill Gates was still just an up & coming Mcrich... a newby in his own right, neuvo wealthy, as it were, just starting to ease into the sedentary lifestyle of a maturing modern day robber barron with oodles of $$ to throw around here and there ...."philanthropism" as they like to characterize themselves. At that time Gates was said to be donating a few millions of dollars towards the agenda of ultimate crowd control; how much better can the prospect of controlling crowds get if/when one succeeds in convincing the crowds to stop procreating? ;) Anyway, Bills few millions of "giving" paled in comparison to the likes of a Ted Turner or a George Soros. "Soros", a shortened form for Schwartz, is of local interest (Pennsylvania) since some of the dots in his latter career in finance connects to some of the older dots once prominent around these parts - such as the Andrew Mellon family (of the infamous Aluminum / Fluouride cartel), the Carnegies, the Heinz's (and through marriage, the Forbes's) and the subsequent host of philanthropic things that for the past century has helped the greater Pittsburgh metro area, as well as Pennsylvania and nation/world at large, go tick tock, ding dong, your dead. At the end of the planned day, which in this context is to say, at the end of the aborted day, people who've been programmed over the years to have an affinity for that kind of agenda owe a large debt of thanks to the George Soros's of the world for how they have helped greatly to lead the cause - READ: dontating billions upon billions of ill-gotten corporate $$ profits .... Philanthropy at it's finest, in first convincing millions of Americans of the need/rationale, and secondly informing them .... "polling" ..... "advertising" .... "more polling", repeat as necessary, how to go about, the whys / hows / wherefors of preventing new life whenever possible, AND when failing that, how to go about snuffing it out at an early stage after the fact. I thought you might also be interested to read of the indirect connection of dots between, for instance, a Mexico (relevant to this thread) and the IMF figure (by way of being Clinto's Secretary of Treasury) "helping poor, under-developed nations" nod nod, wink wink..... isn't it interesting that the world's highest offices of politically motivated philanthropic interests had done such a fine job of managing the scourge of poor Mexicans that they were quite likely a leading impetus behind the steady stream of those poor Mexicans flooding into this country during the past 10 years?