Re: what would you do???????????????

Below are a a few relavant quotes. The first came from a post right here at CZ during the last week. Bear in mind these are a relative tiny sample from a wide see of examples easy to dredge up from the world we all live in. Across the range of these quotes, they pretty much define the bounds of the wide spectrum of variations by which we the people routinely choose to do the wrong thing, daily, when it comes to the question of "what would you do?". Ultimately it is shown, time and again, how difficult it has become down through the years for we people to acknowledge & admit to how well trained we are to tolerate & accept de facto government - government by fraud and the attendant force necessary to enforce that fraud, as a substitute to de jure governmnet - government founded and established upon Godly principles of legitmite law.

In my opinion, Zoe's sentiments also provide another good example of the same, example of defering to hope/faith in a miserably flawed, rotted out de facto government, but just to be clear, I do not point that out just for the benefit of being critical of only her. I freely admit to being as guilty as her, which is to say, the two of us are just as guilty as is pretty much any/most other average next person among us.

-----------

Q (Jon Rappoport): You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.
A (Dr Mark Randall): Yes, I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.
Q: Why not?
A: I want to preserve my privacy.
Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?
A: I believe I could lose my pension.
Q: On what grounds?
A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once "part of the Club". I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.
Q: Harassed by whom?
A: The FBI.
Q: Really?
A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling, too.
Q: So much for free speech.
A: I was "part of the inner circle". If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.
Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?
A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honourable people, these vaccines would not be granted licences. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.
Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.
A: I know. For a long time I ignored their work.
Q: Why?
A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.

-----------------

In 2007 there was news of a congressional committee agreeing to consider the need to impeech Cheney for the acts of high crimes and treasons he has perpetrated while serving as a central figure in the Bush Administration which itself now has a mostly unbroken 8 year long track record of of routinely commiting on a vast scale, in the name of we the people no less, high crimes and treasons. The speculative question is - is there any realistic hope that the legitimate committe action necessary to effect impeachment will follow? The speculative quote in reply is

"impeachment being legitimately pursued?; highly doubtful. After all, everyone on that committee has family to worry about".

----------

The last quote is one I found several years ago that addresses the same question "what would you do?" from a similar perspective, but one that is more firmlyl based upon a scriptural standard, courtesy of Isaiah 1:1-26, which it (the quote) then compares to a different track record of sorts that we the people (figuratively and or literally as the case may be) have stood watch over while events have transpired beore us down through the years. This of course involves translation of a collective work that itself has provided it's own ancient and dubious history, one not likely to be solved here or any where else soon. Nonetheless, if one can agree to substitute terms such as "children" .... "sinful nation" .... "my people" ... "Israel" ... "Zion" .... "my people" and the like, with "we the people", and substitute for other terms like "country" ..... "nation" , "children" that I have nourished and brought up, and the like, with "people of the world of all walks", this quote is speaking to the same basic recurring answer in evidence above.