Re: Guys, this isn't JAMA

This is such a complex issue...
Yes, forsammyray, I can see your point in wanting more evidence etc..
yet look at all these "scientifically tested" and "proven" medicines, that the alopathic model keeps spewing out every week, spending billions of dollars, torturing untold numbers of animals, all in the name of "science" and "scientific proof"...
only to come forth (or try to cover up) couple of months or years later to admit,
"oh yes, it does cause the liver/kidney/heart/etc. failure, oh yes, it actually is caustic and dangerous and poisonous to human health"...
we see it on the daily basis...

Is this the kind of evidence you are looking for?
Just because something was "scientifically proven safe or effective" in someone's lab, does not make it so.
So many of these "scientists" are working for or paid by the very same companies, that are trying to sell the final product... is this what you would call "objective"?

I know I am preaching to the choir here (hopefully!), but it does help to keep in mind, that just because some big ("un-named") agency approved the product for human consumption does not make it safe, most of the time on the contrary...


So yes, it would help to have more detailed information and data and stats, but just be careful to not throw the baby out with the bathwater.