Re: Ultimate Zapper VS others ( edit )

>- The credentials I present for Dr. Lloyd are those that are available on the internet.

Apparantly, there is more than one Dr. Richard Lloyd in the world.

At least I botherd to contact the source to verify and I reported what his comments were.

>- In fact, there are no studies that I am aware of which show that a dual frequency or multi-frequency unit is superior to a single frequency unit.

When we originally started, we produced a single frequency zapper of 2000 Hz because we read it was better. We also produced one using both 2500 Hz and 30000 Hz which allowed the customers to choose which frequency to use. The ones who used 2500 Hz only got better results than those who used 30000 Hz only. Those who used both frequncy got much better results.

We would not have made the more expensive dual frequency zappers if they did not work better. The single frequency unit sold for $58 and then we sold the dual frequency for the same price.

While he does not produce or sell them any more because of the FDA and the FTC, Dr. Lloyd's zapper was multiple frequency. Why would he do that if he thought your single frequency was better?

>- From someone who purports to be posting to this forum to give unbiased information, and nothing more, your biased attitude is quite obvious and belies your stated role of objective observer.

This is an exact reflection of you. I have stated nothing but the truth, although you are not willing to accept it.

The proof is in the pictures: http://www.paradevices.com/ultimate_zapper_cheaply_made.html