Lots of smoke, but nothing to do with vaccines

I fear that in your haste to declare yourself victorious, you overlooked the fact that none of your links (some of which are repeated multiple times) have anything to do with studies establishing the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.

The search you did before your cut and paste-a-thon also turned up a reference to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, which you assumed was the same as America's NIH. However it's a British group connected with their National Health Service, so it has even less to do with vaccine studies than your other links.

Instead of once again resorting to Conspiracy theories, you might take a serious look at the evidence before damning all vaccines. I also suggest that you and other antivaxers think twice before again citing the Geiers and Andrew Wakefield, who as previously noted think that autistic kids should be drugged with Lupron and other pharma drugs (Geiers) or that it's OK to get paid off by lawyers to promote sleazy studies attacking the MMR vaccine, leading to decreased vaccination in the U.K., increased measles cases and unnecessary deaths (Wakefield).

DQ: "No one ever said that non-industry studies were all immaculate"

So your response to what the Geiers and Wakefield have done is "Well, no one's perfect."

Wow. Tweet