The collapse of fact and reason

What a feeble effort to come back with nothing but a mainstream denial quoting from no less of a mainsteam source than the Pediatrics Journal itself - as if they would EVER publish anything that admitted that they have been poisoning our children for years?  That will happen about the same time the American Dental Association puts out a warning about mercury amalgam fillings.

Your post was so transparent and pathetic that you even felt compelled to use one of the oldest tactics in the books for a thoroughly unsupportable argument - concluding that anyone who disagrees could only do so for two wrong reasons of your own furnishing.  Or was that your own masters furnishing?

I fully expected that you would have no choice but to make a response to the post on behalf of those who either brainwash you or compensate you - or both.  I am beginning to believe more and more that there surely has to be some compensation involved.  If so, I hope for your sake you are paid by the post and not by the results or effectiveness. Who is it, Merck?  Perhaps the same folks who funded the study you quoted?  You do acknowledge that it was an industry funded study, don't you?  In which case, pehaps it might be germaine to mention that industry funded studies have been found to return favorable results to those who fund them by a mere 5 to 1 margin compared to independent studies (such as the independent studies quoted here by others).

The masters you so weakly serve, whether voluntarily or otherwise, attempt to play God and better nature, but they aren't and they can't.  When it comes to nature versus the efforts of man, nature wins hands down and always has.  It is only when it comes to profits versus man that both mankind and nature loses out.  That is happening all too much these days and I, for one, am sick and tired of it.  Fortunately, I do use nature and not man made poisons, so I am not nearly as sick and tired physically as many of are who are trapped in our system of managed illness.

You continually post here about your concerns for how dangerous it would be to deprive our children of the benefits you say happen when we subject their young and devloping bodies to the horrors of being injected with vaccines containing a devils brew of agents such as mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, spermacide, unborn human and animal fetal matter, anthrax, monkey kidney cells,  calf serums, rhesus monkey material, formalin, phenol, coal tar, aspartame, MSG, various strains of deadly viruses and microbial contaminants.

For all I know, you may even somehow believe your contention that introducing such frightening chemical and biological agents really is beneficial - although there is no indication at all that you have bothered to take an open-minded look at a great many references that have been pointed out to you.  We here at CureZone on the other hand, have been bombarded with the mainstream premises and propaganda our entire lives, and we have rejected it and sought to educate ourselves about other points of view.  In doing so, I would say that we are far more qualified to make objective decisions about what we put in our bodies and our children's bodies than you are - and it really serves you no good at all to continue to repeat what we have already heard and rejected too many times to imagine.

I would like to give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you do what you do out of true concern.  Somehow, though, I cannot shake the feeling that if you were honest with us and yourself you would likely agree that only a few years ago you would have also been here voicing the same concerns about avoiding another prior industry mainstay and pointing to similar industry studies avowing the safety of Vioxx.

DQ