Re: The collapse of fact and reason

The body of evidence i have seen posted here largely suports the opposite of your conclusion. Of course that evidence by and large consists of studies funded by people who do not have a financial stake in the outcome of the study.  It is the body of industry funded evidence you surely refer to.

All you appear able to do is to parrot your previous discredited posts and studies, including the one about autism rates should be declining.  And THAT is precisely what we have come to expect from YOU.

You are right though - I do tend to get carried away at times.  Sorry, you really do seem like a decent guy - but it is simply maddening to see so much clear evidence presented to you time and again and see you refuse to take an objective look at it, but rather merely come back time again and again with the same contentions and same studies that have been shot down in virtually every single instance.

How about an easy one:

Why do you suppose it is that autism is virtually non-existent in home studied children who have NO vaccinations?  If not mercury, could you tell us just what it is about vaccinations that is the causal agent?

DQ